Unifying Semantic Priors and High-Frequency Traces: Enhancing V-JEPA with Mixture-of-Experts for Robust Synthetic Image Forensics
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Multimodal MoE models
Abstract (arXiv)
The unchecked proliferation of manipulated images on social media platforms has increased the spread of misinformation, posing a severe threat to public trust and information integrity. Modern deepfake detectors typically rely on Vision Transformers (ViTs) to capture the low-level inconsistencies that characterize fully synthetic or locally tampered images. However, the global understanding of such foundation models is not enough to discriminate alone between real and fake multimedia content, especially in challenging scenarios where images are compressed or transmitted through social media. In this paper we pioneer the application of Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) models to deepfake detection, taking advantage of the generalized representation of visual reality that such World Models have exhibited. We hypothesize, and empirically demonstrate, that the intrinsic world understanding of JEPA models can be used as a strong prior for a deepfake detector. To fully exploit JEPA capabilities, we propose MoE-JEPA, a dual-stream architecture for deepfake detection. By enhancing a V-JEPA 2 backbone with a Residual Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) mechanism, along with a noise stream branch, our model dynamically internalizes forensic knowledge. Furthermore, a Gated Attention Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) module is employed to ensure precise spatial semantic understanding. Evaluated on the SID-Set benchmark, comprising 300K AI-generated, tampered and authentic images, MoE-JEPA establishes a new state-of-the-art with an accuracy of 95.54%, successfully outperforming vastly larger models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal MoE models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.
Builds on
29 of 43 references.
References · 29
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 982
- 2025FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Spacecited by 960
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 842
- 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 738
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 501
- 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 490
17 more
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 483
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 386
- 2023GenImage: A Million-Scale Benchmark for Detecting AI-Generated Imagecited by 318
- 2020Global Texture Enhancement for Fake Face Detection in the Wildcited by 220
- 2023PatchCraft: Exploring Texture Patch for Efficient AI-generated Image Detectioncited by 119
- 2021M2TR: Multi-modal Multi-scale Transformers for Deepfake Detectioncited by 114
- 2024SIDA: Social Media Image Deepfake Detection, Localization and Explanation with Large Multimodal Modelcited by 107
- 2022Protecting Celebrities from DeepFake with Identity Consistency Transformercited by 95
- 2022Fusing Global and Local Features for Generalized AI-Synthesized Image Detectioncited by 88
- 2022UIA-ViT: Unsupervised Inconsistency-Aware Method based on Vision Transformer for Face Forgery Detectioncited by 69
- 2023AntifakePrompt: Prompt-Tuned Vision-Language Models are Fake Image Detectorscited by 64
- 2022Residual Mixture of Expertscited by 39
- 2024MoE-FFD: Mixture of Experts for Generalized and Parameter-Efficient Face Forgery Detectioncited by 27
- 2023Detecting Generated Images by Real Images Onlycited by 20
- 2024A Timely Survey on Vision Transformer for Deepfake Detectioncited by 10
- 2025On DeepSeekMoE: Statistical Benefits of Shared Experts and Normalized Sigmoid Gatingcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Veritas: Generalizable Deepfake Detection via Pattern-Aware Reasoning
- 2026Deepfake Forensics Adapter: A Dual-Stream Network for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
- 2025LLMs Are Not Yet Ready for Deepfake Image Detection
- 2025The Deepfake Detective: Interpreting Neural Forensics Through Sparse Features and Manifolds
- 2025A Hybrid Deep Learning and Forensic Approach for Robust Deepfake Detection
- 2024Evolving from Single-modal to Multi-modal Facial Deepfake Detection: Progress and Challenges
- 2026MSU Team at the Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge 2026: Grounded Artifact Evidence for Deepfake Detection
- 2026Look Before You Judge: Training-Free Region Mining for Grounded and Explainable Deepfake Detection