mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Specifying Reward Functions for RL Without Environment Sampling

arXiv 2609.15544 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Enabling human stakeholders to specify reward functions that lead to their desired outcomes is a key challenge in deploying reinforcement learning agents. Preference-based methods such as online RLHF can reduce the burden of manual reward design, but they require repeatedly training policies, sampling trajectories from the real world, and eliciting feedback, making them impractical in settings where environment interaction is computationally expensive or unsafe. We introduce Experience-Free Autonomous Reward Specification (EARS), a method for learning reward functions from preferences without environment interaction. Our approach uses a structured LLM-mediated process to construct a small set of expressive reward features from a task description and the environment observation space, then strategically samples imagined trajectories in this feature space and learns feature weights from preferences over the imagined trajectory pairs. We evaluate on three long-horizon domains: pandemic lockdown regulation design, insulin administration for diabetes patients, and autonomous vehicle control on a highway. We compare EARS to baselines that also enable reward specification without environment interaction--namely, methods that directly prompt an LLM to generate a reward function. When learning from either ground-truth preference labels or preferences labeled by a LLM, EARS designs reward functions that are more aligned with the ground truth reward function that produced the preferences or LLM context than these baselines. These results suggest that preference-based reward specification remains effective without environment sampling, enabling practical reward design in settings where collecting real trajectories is costly or infeasible.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 26 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

26 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Influencing Humans to Conform to Preference Models for RLHF11 Jan
  2. 2024A Unified Linear Programming Framework for Offline Reward Learning from Human Demonstrations and Feedback20 May
  3. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHF13 May
  4. 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models19 Oct
  5. 2023Text2Reward: Reward Shaping with Language Models for Reinforcement Learning20 Sep
  6. 2022Models of human preference for learning reward functions5 Jun
  7. 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
  8. 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Atari15 Nov
  9. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 17

  1. 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
  2. 2022The Effects of Reward Misspecification: Mapping and Mitigating Misaligned Modelscited by 328
  3. 2023Language to Rewards for Robotic Skill Synthesiscited by 312
  4. 2023Reward Design with Language Modelscited by 261
  5. 2021Batch Active Learning at Scalecited by 127
  6. 2021Epistemic Neural Networkscited by 120
  7. 2021Dueling RL: Reinforcement Learning with Trajectory Preferencescited by 106
  8. 2017Flow: A Modular Learning Framework for Mixed Autonomy Trafficcited by 73
  9. 2024Beyond Preferences in AI Alignmentcited by 49
  10. 2024Efficient Exploration for LLMscited by 45
  11. 2014Safe Exploration of State and Action Spaces in Reinforcement Learningcited by 38
  12. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Closed-Loop Blood Glucose Controlcited by 26
5 more
  1. 2020Reinforcement Learning for Optimization of COVID-19 Mitigation policiescited by 25
  2. 2023Efficient Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning Using Learned Dynamics Modelscited by 21
  3. 2025Towards Improving Reward Design in RL: A Reward Alignment Metric for RL Practitionerscited by 10
  4. 2024Batch Active Learning of Reward Functions from Human Preferencescited by 8
  5. 2021Safety-Aware Preference-Based Learning for Safety-Critical Controlcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Benchmarks and Algorithms for Offline Preference-Based Reward Learning
  2. 2023Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Function
  3. 2022Rewards Encoding Environment Dynamics Improves Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026CoRe: Combined Rewards with Vision-Language Model Feedback for Preference-Aligned Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025RLAF: Reinforcement Learning from Automaton Feedback
  7. 2025Repairing Reward Functions with Feedback to Mitigate Reward Hacking
  8. 2025Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?