mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who Teaches Which Token? Verifier-Gated Multi-Expert On-Policy Distillation for Scientific Reasoning

arXiv 2609.15404 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-teacher on-policy distillation (OPD) is becoming the standard way to integrate specialist capabilities into one model: train experts with RL, then distill them into the student on its own rollouts. Existing recipes assign supervision at the sequence level - each prompt goes to one domain teacher and every token receives the same weight - which implicitly assumes that a teacher is uniformly useful across a response. We find instead that useful teacher signal is sparse and heterogeneous along a reasoning trajectory, which raises a finer question: who should teach which token? Verifier-Gated Multi-Expert On-Policy Distillation (VG-OPD) answers it by verification: the counterfactual gain of an expert on a specific answer criterion licenses that expert to teach, its disagreement with the student localizes the supervision, and criterion importance sets its weight; the gated KL enters GRPO as an additive token-level advantage. Instantiated for scientific reasoning with RL-trained capability experts, VG-OPD attains the best overall performance on seven benchmarks for 4B and 8B students, ranking first on five at both scales, with the largest gains on knowledge-intensive scientific reasoning tasks. Further analysis shows that the gains come from localizing verified supervision rather than from adding teachers or distillation loss: misplacing the same supervision budget is the single most damaging change, and indiscriminate distillation drags RL below its own floor where gated distillation lifts it.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 35 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

35 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Reward-Gated On-Policy Distillation4 Jul
  2. 2026Skill-Conditioned Gated Self-Distillation for LLM Reasoning27 May
  3. 2026A Recipe for Long-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models via On-Policy Optimization and Distillation12 May
  4. 2026Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe14 Apr
  5. 2026Scaling Reasoning Efficiently via Relaxed On-Policy Distillation11 Mar

Other references · 30

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  4. 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
  5. 2025General-Reasoner: Advancing LLM Reasoning Across All Domainscited by 132
  6. 2026TIP: Token Importance in On-Policy Distillationcited by 90
  7. 2025NaturalReasoning: Reasoning in the Wild with 2.8M Challenging Questionscited by 81
  8. 2026MOPD: Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation for Capability Integration in LLM Post-Trainingcited by 60
  9. 2025MegaScience: Pushing the Frontiers of Post-Training Datasets for Science Reasoningcited by 56
  10. 2026Not All Disagreement Is Learnable: Token Teachability in On-Policy Distillationcited by 42
  11. 2026Trust Region On-Policy Distillationcited by 26
  12. 2026Counteraction-Aware Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation for General Capability Recovery with Domain Preservationcited by 14
18 more
  1. 2026SG-OPD: Sign-Gated On-Policy Distillation via Sign-Consistency Gating and Phased Teacher Samplingcited by 12
  2. 2026Rubric-based On-policy Distillationcited by 11
  3. 2026Rubric-Guided Self-Distillation: Post-Training Without Rubric Verifierscited by 9
  4. 2026Rethinking Reward Supervision: Rubric-Conditioned Self-Distillationcited by 9
  5. 2026DOPD: Dual On-policy Distillationcited by 9
  6. 2026Distill Where You Fail: Recovering Learning Signals of Negative RL-Groups from Adaptive Teacher Guidancecited by 8
  7. 2026EvoRubric: Self-Evolving Rubric-Driven RL for Open-Ended Generationcited by 7
  8. 2026H-OPD: Confidence Aware Heterogeneous Multi-Teacher Multimodal On-policy Distillationcited by 7
  9. 2026CROP: Task Relevance via Counterfactuals for Selective On-Policy Distillationcited by 5
  10. 2026Improving Data and Reward Design for Scientific Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 4
  11. 2026CriPO: Enhancing Rubric-based RL via Self-Distillationcited by 4
  12. 2026ARES: Automated Rubric Synthesis for Scalable LLM Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  13. 2026Reinforcement Learning with Robust Rubric Rewardscited by 2
  14. 2026When Top-K Misses the Decision: Tool-Call Drift in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillationcited by 2
  15. 2026DAPD: Dual-Anchored Policy Distillationcited by 2
  16. 2026Rubrics as Privileged Information for Open-Ended Generationcited by 2
  17. 2026Beyond the Best Teacher: Expanding and Compressing the Reasoning Solution Manifoldcited by 1
  18. 2026Woodpecker Distillation: Weak Models Diagnose Reasoning Bugs in Strong Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Contrastive On-Policy Distillation
  2. 2026How Should Teachers Be Prepared? RL on Student-Induced States for On-Policy Distillation
  3. 2026Calibrating Teacher--Student Discrepancy for On-Policy Distillation
  4. 2026When Are Teacher Tokens Reliable? Position-Weighted On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoning
  5. 2026Unmasking On-Policy Distillation: Where It Helps, Where It Hurts, and Why
  6. 2026The Many Faces of On-Policy Distillation: Pitfalls, Mechanisms, and Fixes
  7. 2026Transfer-Stratified On-Policy Distillation for RL-Improved Reasoning Teachers
  8. 2026Learning to Revise Reasoning with Segment-wise On-Policy Distillation