mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CriPO: Enhancing Rubric-based RL via Self-Distillation

arXiv 2607.18082 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rubric-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) has recently shown promise in improving Large Language Models (LLMs) on open-ended tasks. A widely recognized limitation of rubric-based RL is limited exploration: criteria that no rollout manages to satisfy (Unexplored Criteria) receive no optimization signal. Recent methods address this by incorporating rubric information as external guidance during rollout generation, yet they introduce a train-inference mismatch: the policy is optimized on rollouts produced under external guidance while this guidance is absent at inference time, causing error accumulation through autoregressive decoding. Moreover, these exploration-focused approaches overlook a fundamentally different failure mode that we term Suppressed Criteria---criteria that are satisfied by some rollouts yet whose learning signals might be lost during optimization because scalar reward aggregation assigns them non-positive aggregate advantages. Our analysis reveals that suppressed criteria constitute a persistent and non-negligible failure mode---over 25% of samples exhibit this issue throughout training. To simultaneously address both unexplored and suppressed criteria without introducing training-inference mismatch, we propose Criterion-Distilled Policy Optimization (CriPO), which enhances rubric-based RL via on-policy self-distillation. For unexplored criteria, CriPO constructs a behavior-injection teacher and computes a filtered forward-KL loss to inject missing behaviors into the policy. For suppressed criteria, CriPO uses a counterfactual teacher to locate criterion-relevant tokens in negative-advantage rollouts, and corrects their advantages in GRPO to preserve useful patterns. Experiments on medicine and science benchmarks demonstrate that CriPO outperforms existing rubric-based RL methods, e.g., achieving an average gain of 3.3 points over GRPO on Qwen3-4B.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

Builds on

39 of 45 references.

References · 39

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  4. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  5. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  6. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  7. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,099
  8. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  9. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  10. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 478
  11. 2026Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 386
  12. 2025HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Healthcited by 385
27 more
  1. 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
  2. 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillationcited by 285
  3. 2026Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipecited by 262
  4. 2025SWE-RL: Advancing LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning on Open Software Evolutioncited by 246
  5. 2025DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research Agentscited by 236
  6. 2026On-Policy Context Distillation for Language Modelscited by 161
  7. 2026A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 148
  8. 2025Checklists Are Better Than Reward Models For Aligning Language Modelscited by 115
  9. 2025WritingBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Generative Writingcited by 95
  10. 2026Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?cited by 87
  11. 2026Unifying Group-Relative and Self-Distillation Policy Optimization via Sample Routingcited by 65
  12. 2025Breaking the Exploration Bottleneck: Rubric-Scaffolded Reinforcement Learning for General LLM Reasoningcited by 56
  13. 2026Self-Distilled Agentic Reinforcement Learningcited by 49
  14. 2025ResearchQA: Evaluating Scholarly Question Answering at Scale Across 75 Fields with Survey-Mined Questions and Rubricscited by 44
  15. 2026The Many Faces of On-Policy Distillation: Pitfalls, Mechanisms, and Fixescited by 37
  16. 2026RLCSD: Reinforcement Learning with Contrastive On-Policy Self-Distillationcited by 33
  17. 2025LLMEval-Med: A Real-world Clinical Benchmark for Medical LLMs with Physician Validationcited by 29
  18. 2025QA-LIGN: Aligning LLMs through Constitutionally Decomposed QAcited by 28
  19. 2025The Reasoning Boundary Paradox: How Reinforcement Learning Constrains Language Modelscited by 17
  20. 2026STEPS: Selective On-Policy Self-Distillation for Reasoningcited by 15
  21. 2026Rebellious Student: Reversing Teacher Signals for Reasoning Exploration with Self-Distilled RLVRcited by 13
  22. 2026Rubric-Guided Self-Distillation: Post-Training Without Rubric Verifierscited by 9
  23. 2026Rethinking Reward Supervision: Rubric-Conditioned Self-Distillationcited by 9
  24. 2026Rubrics to Tokens: Bridging Response-level Rubrics and Token-level Rewards in Instruction Following Taskscited by 8
  25. 2026Self-Distilled Policy Gradientcited by 6
  26. 2026RuCL: Stratified Rubric-Based Curriculum Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoningcited by 5
  27. 2026Experience is the Best Teacher: Motivating Effective Exploration in Reinforcement Learning for LLMscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.