mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PACIFIC: a framework for generating benchmarks to check Precise Automatically Checked Instruction Following In Code

arXiv 2512.10713 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2025cs.SE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Model (LLM)-based code assistants have emerged as a powerful application of generative AI, demonstrating impressive capabilities in code generation and comprehension. A key requirement for these systems is their ability to accurately follow user instructions. We present Precise Automatically Checked Instruction Following In Code (PACIFIC), a novel framework designed to automatically generate benchmarks that rigorously assess sequential instruction-following and code dry-running capabilities in LLMs, while allowing control over benchmark difficulty. PACIFIC produces benchmark variants with clearly defined expected outputs, enabling straightforward and reliable evaluation through simple output comparisons. In contrast to existing approaches that often rely on tool usage or agentic behavior, our work isolates and evaluates the LLM's intrinsic ability to reason through code behavior step-by-step without execution (dry running) and to follow instructions. Furthermore, our framework mitigates training data contamination by facilitating effortless generation of novel benchmark variations. We validate our framework by generating a suite of benchmarks spanning a range of difficulty levels and evaluating multiple state-of-the-art LLMs. Our results demonstrate that PACIFIC can produce increasingly challenging benchmarks that effectively differentiate instruction-following and dry running capabilities, even among advanced models. Overall, our framework offers a scalable, contamination-resilient methodology for assessing core competencies of LLMs in code-related tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2025.

Builds on

9 of 31 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
  3. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 879
  4. 2024CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and Executioncited by 294
  5. 2024InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 128
  6. 2023FollowBench: A Multi-level Fine-grained Constraints Following Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 112
  7. 2025AutoCodeBench: Large Language Models are Automatic Code Benchmark Generatorscited by 24
  8. 2025CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 18
  9. 2025CodeIF-Bench: Evaluating Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models in Interactive Code Generationcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MTAC-IFBench: Benchmarking Instruction-Following in Multi-Turn Agentic Coding
  2. 2025Enhancing LLM Code Generation: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Collaboration and Runtime Debugging for Improved Accuracy, Reliability, and Latency
  3. 2026CoRE: A Fine-Grained Code Reasoning Benchmark Beyond Output Prediction
  4. 2023Turbulence: Systematically and Automatically Testing Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models for Code
  5. 2026Pseudo2CodeQA: A Benchmark for LLM-Based Structured Algorithmic Reasoning in Code Generation
  6. 2026Steerable Instruction Following Coding Data Synthesis with Actor-Parametric Schema Co-Evolution
  7. 2025Training with Pseudo-Code for Instruction Following
  8. 2025An Empirical Study of Reasoning Steps in Thinking Code LLMs