mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CyFM: Cylindrical Optimal Transport for Few-Step Complex-Valued Flow Matching

arXiv 2609.14171 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Complex-valued signals like MRI and audio spectrograms are typically modelled as flat two-channel Euclidean data. The inherited Euclidean metric dA2 + A2 dθ2 vanishes at the origin, leaving phase unpenalised exactly where the signal is weakest. We replace it with the decoupled product metric dA2 + dθ2 on the cylindrical closure [0, ∞) × S1, which stays non-degenerate at A = 0. We measure what this substitution costs and buys. Exact analytical bridges across synthetic fields, fastMRI knee data, and LibriSpeech spectrograms show Cartesian paths induce a heavy-tailed angular velocity distribution (Pareto index ≈ 1). Under independent coupling, 43%-49% of signal energy falls on paths turning faster than π rad per unit time. Cylindrical paths never reach this speed. We formulate Cylindrical Flow Matching (CyFM) to strictly bound the angular regression target, coupling noise and data via exact minibatch Optimal Transport jointly over whole fields. This coupling reduces few-step generation error by 3%-60%. CyFM achieves lower generative error than the best Cartesian baseline at every step up to k = 8 on synthetic fields and speech spectrograms, with all seeds separated. On knee MRI, the single-step advantage is 1.8x. At convergence (k = 100), the two geometries show no significant difference. Finally, a prior-only control exposes the cost of flat parametrisation: on synthetic fields, a single Cartesian Euler step performs worse than the unintegrated noise prior (0.376 vs. 0.150).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 21 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2026.

Builds on

21 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026One-Sided Quantile Coupling for Flow Matching2 Aug
  2. 2026Expected Batch Optimal Transport Plans and Consequences for Flow Matching12 May
  3. 2026Direct Product Flow Matching: Decoupling Radial and Angular Dynamics for Few-Shot Adaptation6 May
  4. 2026DisRFM: Polar Riemannian Flow Matching for Structure-Preserving Graph Domain Adaptation31 Jan
  5. 2024Metric Flow Matching for Smooth Interpolations on the Data Manifold23 May
  6. 2023SE(3)-Stochastic Flow Matching for Protein Backbone Generation3 Oct
  7. 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings28 Apr
  8. 2023Flow Matching on General Geometries7 Feb
  9. 2023Improving and generalizing flow-based generative models with minibatch optimal transport1 Feb
  10. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct
  11. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep

Other references · 10

  1. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2022Building Normalizing Flows with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 995
  4. 2018fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRIcited by 470
  5. 2021Score-based diffusion models for accelerated MRIcited by 311
  6. 2017Deep Complex Networkscited by 217
  7. 2020Riemannian Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 145
  8. 2025PhaseGen: A Diffusion-Based Approach for Complex-Valued MRI Data Generationcited by 3
  9. 2025UniverSR: Unified and Versatile Audio Super-Resolution via Vocoder-Free Flow Matchingcited by 3
  10. 2026Generative Modeling of Complex-Valued Brain MRI Datacited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Correcting CondOT: Exact Finite-Step Sampling in Gaussian Flow Matching
  2. 2026Correcting Source Mismatch in Flow Matching with Radial-Angular Transport
  3. 2026VTV-FM: Flow Matching through Variational Terminal-Velocity Closure
  4. 2026Same Flow, Different Paths: Variance Reduction in Flow Matching
  5. 2026Optimal Transport Flow Matching by Design
  6. 2026Flow Matching under Noisy Latent Structure: Beyond Exact Low-Dimensional Support
  7. 2024Consistency Flow Matching: Defining Straight Flows with Velocity Consistency
  8. 2025OAT-FM: Optimal Acceleration Transport for Improved Flow Matching