mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

One-Sided Quantile Coupling for Flow Matching

arXiv 2608.00978 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Flow Matching trains continuous-time generative models by regressing the velocity field of a probability path between a simple source distribution and a target data distribution. The coupling that pairs source and target samples strongly affects optimization and sample quality, but structured couplings typically rely on mini-batch transport or assignment procedures whose cost grows at least quadratically in batch size. We propose Quantile Coupling Flow Matching (QC-FM), a lightweight one-sided coupling: rather than matching two pre-sampled batches, it samples only the data batch and constructs each paired source directly. Data ranks projected along a small number of random orthogonal directions are mapped to Gaussian quantiles, and the latent code is completed in the orthogonal complement by conditional Gaussian sampling. The construction is one-dimensional per slice, so the coupling requires no pairwise cost matrix and no assignment to solve. We show that, for each drawn frame, this coupling eliminates the irreducible regression variance along every selected slice and makes the ideal flow exactly straight there, while leaving the sampling prior unchanged: generation still starts from the standard Gaussian, and the training source deviates from it only through the copula of the slice codes, whose transport cost we bound. For training, we apply QC to an anchor subset and complete the remaining source slots with exact Gaussian samples, retaining the QC bias while preserving an explicit signal from the Baseline coupling. Across CIFAR-10, CelebA, FFHQ, and ImageNet-64, QC-FM improves over the Baseline under matched training budgets, reducing FID by up to 12.9%, and outperforms OT-CFM on all four datasets. These results suggest that preserving projected rank structure is a simple and scalable way to inject useful geometric bias into FM couplings without solving a mini-batch transport problem.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Optimal Transport Flow Matching by Design2 Jun
  2. 2026Expected Batch Optimal Transport Plans and Consequences for Flow Matching12 May
  3. 2026What Time Is It? How Data Geometry Makes Time Conditioning Optional for Flow Matching8 May
  4. 2026Faster Inference of Flow-Based Generative Models via Improved Data-Noise Coupling16 Mar
  5. 2025Beyond Optimal Transport: Model-Aligned Coupling for Flow Matching29 May
  6. 2023Multisample Flow Matching: Straightening Flows with Minibatch Couplings28 Apr
  7. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow7 Sep

Other references · 13

  1. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,779
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  4. 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
  5. 2019Generalized Sliced Wasserstein Distancescited by 208
  6. 2023Stochastic interpolants with data-dependent couplingscited by 100
  7. 2019Learning with minibatch Wasserstein : asymptotic and gradient propertiescited by 87
  8. 2020Sliced Iterative Normalizing Flowscited by 38
  9. 2024Denoising Task Difficulty-based Curriculum for Training Diffusion Modelscited by 27
  10. 2016Iterative Gaussianization: from ICA to Random Rotationscited by 26
  11. 2025VCT: Training Consistency Models with Variational Noise Couplingcited by 15
  12. 2024Immiscible Diffusion: Accelerating Diffusion Training with Noise Assignmentcited by 14
1 more
  1. 2025Understanding, Accelerating, and Improving MeanFlow Trainingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond Straightness: Non-Crossing Flow Matching via Quantile AlignTree Coupling
  2. 2026The Coupling Within: Flow Matching via Distilled Normalizing Flows
  3. 2026Difficulty-Calibrated Interpolation Paths for Conditional Flow Matching
  4. 2025Low-Bit, High-Fidelity: Optimal Transport Quantization for Flow Matching
  5. 2026Structured Coupling for Flow Matching
  6. 2024Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models
  7. 2025Is There a Better Source Distribution than Gaussian? Exploring Source Distributions for Image Flow Matching
  8. 2026Gaussian Flow-Matching Schedules: Implications for Sampling and Training