Infra-Bench CLS: A Global, Open-Source Benchmark for Critical Infrastructure Classification with Earth Observation Foundation Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Critical infrastructure location data is often incomplete and unevenly distributed globally, especially in developing regions. Earth observation foundation models are proposed as a new step in enabling us to more efficiently understand the natural and built environment, raising questions as to their effectiveness in performing challenging downstream tasks. Yet, foundation models remain largely untested for detecting and classifying the facility-scale critical infrastructure that underpins a range of important societal and economic functions. Subsequently, Infra-Bench CLS is introduced as a benchmark to test foundation models on 18,756 Sentinel-1 SAR and Sentinel-2 multispectral facility-scale critical infrastructure asset images covering seven continents and 13 infrastructure classes, with results reported for the 10 retained classes. Using linear probing and fine-tuning for two training dataset levels (1.0x and 0.3x), seven foundation models are evaluated (SatlasPretrain S2, SatlasPretrain S1, CROMA, Prithvi-EO-2.0, AlphaEarth Foundations, OlmoEarth v1.1-Base, and DINOv3 ViT-L/16). When comparing macro F1 scores to a ResNet-18 supervised baseline of 39.2 percent, the best foundation model achieved 57.9 percent, a 48 percent improvement. Top performing classes were airports (F1 85.3 percent), train stations (F1 82.1 percent), and data centers (F1 77.6 percent). By contrast, many of the power sector classes perform poorly (F1 27.5-46.2 percent). These findings suggest foundation models can enable superior critical infrastructure classification, but future work should evaluate performance on higher-resolution imagery, particularly for poorly performing sectors, such as power.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.
Builds on
15 of 57 references.
References · 15
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
- 2024Prithvi-EO-2.0: A Versatile Multi-Temporal Foundation Model for Earth Observation Applicationscited by 144
- 2025AlphaEarth Foundations: An embedding field model for accurate and efficient global mapping from sparse label datacited by 137
- 2024Neural Plasticity-Inspired Multimodal Foundation Model for Earth Observationcited by 104
- 2024PANGAEA: A Global and Inclusive Benchmark for Geospatial Foundation Modelscited by 68
- 2025Galileo: Learning Global & Local Features of Many Remote Sensing Modalitiescited by 43
- 2025GEO-Bench-2: From Performance to Capability, Rethinking Evaluation in Geospatial AIcited by 21
- 2022METER-ML: A Multi-Sensor Earth Observation Benchmark for Automated Methane Source Mappingcited by 18
- 2026EarthShift: a benchmark for measuring robustness to real-world distribution shifts in Earth observationcited by 11
- 2025Geospatial Foundation Models to Enable Progress on Sustainable Development Goalscited by 10
- 2024Evaluating and Benchmarking Foundation Models for Earth Observation and Geospatial AIcited by 8
3 more
- 2026Benchmarking Geospatial Foundation Models for Agriculture Applicationscited by 3
- 2023Assessing the performance of spatial cross-validation approaches for models of spatially structured datacited by 1
- 2026Beyond Accuracy: Assessing Calibration of Geospatial Foundation Models and Their Sensitivity to Distribution Shiftscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.