Building Trust in Autonomous Commerce: A Verifiable Global Event Timeline and AI-Ready Fraud Intelligence Layer
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic commerce protocols such as AP2 and ACP define mechanisms for secure agent-initiated transactions but do not provide interoperable, tamper-evident auditability or verifiable temporal ordering of events across heterogeneous domains. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing a verifiable global event timeline for agentic commerce, constructed from four core components: canonical event schemas that enforce deterministic serialization, deterministic batch formation ensuring reproducible ordering without reliance on synchronized clocks, Merkle-based append-only commitments providing logarithmic-cost inclusion proofs, and blockchain anchoring establishing a tamper-evident temporal backbone. Building on this infrastructure, we introduce a cryptographically signed fraud marker that binds risk labels to anchored evidence through an unforgeable provenance chain, and a dataset lineage model enabling reproducible, tamper-evident AI training pipelines. Empirical results from a prototype implementation demonstrate: Merkle tree construction processes 50,000 events in 47 milliseconds; end-to-end verification completes in under 0.013 milliseconds regardless of batch size; inclusion proof sizes grow logarithmically from 320 bytes at 1,000 events to 512 bytes at 50,000 events; and Merkle-based verification outperforms linear scan by 14.4x at 50,000 events.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.
Builds on
3 of 17 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 2
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries
- 2026A Black Box for Agentic Processes: Blockchain-Anchored Evidence for AI Agent Communication, Human Oversight, and GRC Audits
- 2026TessPay: Verify-then-Pay Infrastructure for Trusted Agentic Commerce
- 2025From Cloud-Native to Trust-Native: A Protocol for Verifiable Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Blockchain-Enabled Artificial Intelligence and AI Agents for Secure Data Sharing and Cybersecurity Applications
- 2025BlockA2A: Towards Secure and Verifiable Agent-to-Agent Interoperability
- 2026A Decision-Centered Reference Architecture for Trustworthy Agentic Commerce
- 2026A402: Binding Cryptocurrency Payments to Service Execution for Agentic Commerce