mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Agents Act on Web3: An Attack-Surface Survey of MCP, Skills, and Tool Calling

arXiv 2608.17275 ↗First posted 18 Aug 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents increasingly act rather than merely read: across the Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem, the share of deployed tools that modify external state has risen from 27% to 65% of tool use. When agents exercise this authority on public blockchains through MCP, skills, and tool calling, the consequences of an attack are governed by the blockchain execution layer rather than by conventional software assumptions. This survey argues that four properties of that layer (irreversibility, signing authority, continuous autonomy, and sequence-level composition) qualitatively change the threat model, turning the recoverable failures of generic agent security into a standing, irreversible loss. We organize the fragmented MCP-security literature into an attack-surface taxonomy, then contribute a Web3 risk-mapping matrix that ties each attack class to its amplified impact, the responsible amplifiers, a representative mitigation, and the residual gap. We synthesize defenses, including emerging blockchain-based mechanisms, and find them improving but insufficient: measured protections stop fewer than 30% of attacks, and model-level safety refuses fewer than 3%. We close by positioning the work against adjacent surveys and deriving a research agenda from the matrix's open cells.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Your Agent Is Mine: Measuring Malicious Intermediary Attacks on the LLM Supply Chain9 Apr
  2. 2026Breaking the Protocol: Security Analysis of the Model Context Protocol Specification and Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in Tool-Integrated LLM Agents24 Jan
  3. 2026Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries8 Jan
  4. 2025MCP-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models with Real-World MCP Servers17 Dec
  5. 2025Systematization of Knowledge: Security and Safety in the Model Context Protocol Ecosystem9 Dec
  6. 2025MCP Security Bench (MSB): Benchmarking Attacks Against Model Context Protocol in LLM Agents14 Oct
  7. 2025MCPTox: A Benchmark for Tool Poisoning Attack on Real-World MCP Servers19 Aug
  8. 2025MCPSecBench: A Systematic Security Benchmark and Playground for Testing Model Context Protocols17 Aug
  9. 2025MCP-Guard: A Multi-Stage Defense-in-Depth Framework for Securing Model Context Protocol in Agentic AI14 Aug
  10. 2025MPMA: Preference Manipulation Attack Against Model Context Protocol16 May
  11. 2025MCP Guardian: A Security-First Layer for Safeguarding MCP-Based AI System17 Apr

Other references · 9

  1. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  2. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  3. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
  4. 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directionscited by 265
  5. 2025Enterprise-Grade Security for the Model Context Protocol (MCP): Frameworks and Mitigation Strategiescited by 42
  6. 2025ETDI: Mitigating Tool Squatting and Rug Pull Attacks in Model Context Protocol (MCP) by using OAuth-Enhanced Tool Definitions and Policy-Based Access Controlcited by 20
  7. 2022Attestation Mechanisms for Trusted Execution Environments Demystifiedcited by 8
  8. 2026How are AI agents used? Evidence from 177,000 MCP toolscited by 7
  9. 2018Remote Credential Management with Mutual Attestation for Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Formal Security Framework for MCP-Based AI Agents: Threat Taxonomy, Verification Models, and Defense Mechanisms
  2. 2025Real AI Agents with Fake Memories: Fatal Context Manipulation Attacks on Web3 Agents
  3. 2026Don't believe everything you read: Understanding and Measuring MCP Behavior under Misleading Tool Descriptions
  4. 2026The Web4 Agent Economy: A Large-Scale Empirical Study of the Landscape, Challenges, and Opportunities ↗
  5. 2026Blockchain-Enabled Artificial Intelligence and AI Agents for Secure Data Sharing and Cybersecurity Applications
  6. 2025MCPXKIT: The Unified Toolkit for Analyzing Model Context Protocol Security
  7. 2025Trivial Trojans: How Minimal MCP Servers Enable Cross-Tool Exfiltration of Sensitive Data
  8. 2026MCP-DPT: A Defense-Placement Taxonomy and Coverage Analysis for Model Context Protocol Security