mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GDB-Reward: From Evaluation Metrics to Training Rewards for Graphic Design

arXiv 2609.02813 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image models excel at natural image synthesis but struggle with graphic design, where success depends on satisfying precise constraints on typography, layout, color, and visual communication. While prompt optimization offers an attractive alternative to expensive diffusion model fine-tuning, learning prompts for frozen image generators requires informative reward functions despite the entirely non-differentiable generation process. Reinforcement learning does not require differentiable objectives; it requires only scalar rewards capable of ranking candidate outputs. This raises a simple question: can design evaluation metrics themselves become reinforcement learning rewards? Our central contribution is GDB-Reward, a framework that systematically transforms heterogeneous graphic design evaluation metrics into a unified reinforcement learning reward. Experiments demonstrate that GDB-Reward provides an effective optimization objective, substantially improving adherence to the design specification in perceptual quality, rendering fidelity, and spatial accuracy while keeping the image generator entirely frozen. More broadly, our results demonstrate that heterogeneous, non-differentiable evaluation metrics can move beyond passive benchmarking to become effective optimization objectives for reinforcement learning in domains where differentiable supervision is unavailable.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 25 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  5. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  6. 2017NIMA: Neural Image Assessmentcited by 387
  7. 2023COLE: A Hierarchical Generation Framework for Multi-Layered and Editable Graphic Designcited by 39
  8. 2024Graphic Design with Large Multimodal Modelcited by 38
  9. 2026CreatiParser: Generative Image Parsing of Raster Graphic Designs into Editable Layerscited by 8
  10. 2026Graphic-Design-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating AI on Graphic Design Taskscited by 6
  11. 2026From Pixels to Policies: Reinforcing Spatial Reasoning in Language Models for Content-Aware Layout Designcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Trust Your Critic: Robust Reward Modeling and Reinforcement Learning for Faithful Image Editing and Generation
  2. 2026Think Before You Score: Thinking Reward Model for Visual Generation
  3. 2025The Image as Its Own Reward: Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Reward for Image Generation
  4. 2026Understanding Reward Hacking in Text-to-Image Reinforcement Learning
  5. 2026Diff-Instruct with Diffused Reward: Towards Principled One-step Generator RL
  6. 2026RationalRewards: Reasoning Rewards Scale Visual Generation Both Training and Test Time
  7. 2026From Broad Exploration to Stable Synthesis: Entropy-Guided Optimization for Autoregressive Image Generation
  8. 2026TASTE: A Designer-Annotated Multi-Dimensional Preference Dataset for AI-Generated Graphic Design