TASTE: A Designer-Annotated Multi-Dimensional Preference Dataset for AI-Generated Graphic Design
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-to-image models now generate graphic design at production scale, yet their supervision still comes primarily from photo-style preference datasets with a single overall verdict per comparison. Designers evaluate designs along several distinct axes (e.g., typography, layout, color harmony) that a single preference label collapses. We release TASTE textit(Typography, Aesthetics, Spatial, Tone, Etc.), a multi-dimensional preference dataset in which two disjoint cohorts of five professional designers each ranked outputs from four current text-to-image models across nine criteria along with per-image hallucination flags. We pair the dataset with two contributions. First, a criterion-agnostic signal-validation framework based on Kendall's τ, majority-vote probability, and Condorcet cycles against exact iid-uniform nulls; the analysis reveals significant but moderate designer agreement, with every TASTE criterion rejecting the random-rater null. Second, we benchmark preference models on TASTE and find that off-the-shelf VLM judges and dedicated T2I scorers fail to reach majority agreement with the designer panel, while a small MLP head trained directly on TASTE substantially narrows the gap to the single-rater ceiling, setting a baseline for future TASTE-trained preference models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2026.
Builds on
28 of 44 references.
References · 28
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
- 2023ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,045
- 2023Pick-a-Pic: An Open Dataset of User Preferences for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 977
- 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
- 2025VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulnesscited by 315
- 2026Qwen3-VL-Embedding and Qwen3-VL-Reranker: A Unified Framework for State-of-the-Art Multimodal Retrieval and Rankingcited by 230
- 2025HPSv3: Towards Wide-Spectrum Human Preference Scorecited by 211
- 2024VisionReward: Fine-Grained Multi-Dimensional Human Preference Learning for Image and Video Generationcited by 156
- 2023AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 142
- 2023Rich Human Feedback for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 141
16 more
- 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generationcited by 135
- 2024Learning Multi-dimensional Human Preference for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 106
- 2024AIGIQA-20K: A Large Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessmentcited by 33
- 2020Predicting Visual Importance Across Graphic Design Typescited by 30
- 2025A Survey of Multimodal Hallucination Evaluation and Detectioncited by 27
- 2025Identifying and Mitigating Position Bias of Multi-image Vision-Language Modelscited by 25
- 2017Learning Visual Importance for Graphic Designs and Data Visualizationscited by 22
- 2023Exploring the Naturalness of AI-Generated Imagescited by 22
- 2024Evaluating Image Hallucination in Text-to-Image Generation with Question-Answeringcited by 16
- 2026Graphic-Design-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating AI on Graphic Design Taskscited by 8
- 2025DesignPref: Capturing Personal Preferences in Visual Design Generationcited by 7
- 2026LICA: Layered Image Composition Annotations for Graphic Design Researchcited by 7
- 2026ImagenWorld: Stress-Testing Image Generation Models with Explainable Human Evaluation on Open-ended Real-World Taskscited by 7
- 2025From Fragment to One Piece: A Survey on AI-Driven Graphic Designcited by 2
- 2026E-comIQ-ZH: A Human-Aligned Dataset and Benchmark for Fine-Grained Evaluation of E-commerce Posters with Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 2
- 2026DistortBench: Benchmarking Vision Language Models on Image Distortion Identificationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026DesignSense: A Human Preference Dataset and Reward Modeling Framework for Graphic Layout Generation
- 2026Can Vision Language Models Assess Graphic Design Aesthetics? A Benchmark, Evaluation, and Dataset Perspective
- 2025AesthetiQ: Enhancing Graphic Layout Design via Aesthetic-Aware Preference Alignment of Multi-modal Large Language Models
- 2026Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation to Individual Taste
- 2025Modeling Aesthetic Preferences in 3D Shapes: A Large-Scale Paired Comparison Study Across Object Categories
- 2026Evolving to the Aesthetics of a Vision-Language Model
- 2026Visual Aesthetic Benchmark: Can Frontier Models Judge Beauty?
- 2026Preferences Order, Ratings Anchor: From Fused Expert Aesthetic Ground Truth to Self-Distillation