mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AdaptNTK: Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification and Active Learning for Neural Network Potentials

arXiv 2609.00488 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.LG physics.chem-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning interatomic potentials bridge the gap between quantum chemical precision and classical computational speed, enabling molecular dynamics simulations with first-principles accuracy. Their reliability is often improved through active learning, which iteratively expands the training set by identifying uncertain, out-of-distribution configurations. Existing uncertainty-quantification methods often involve a trade-off between computational cost and reliability, and generally cannot account for redundancy as an acquisition batch is assembled. Here, we introduce AdaptNTK, a single-model framework that measures uncertainty as a regularized Mahalanobis distance in empirical neural tangent kernel (NTK) feature space. With the NTK features fixed during acquisition, the uncertainty depends on the acquired configurations but not their reference labels. This allows the uncertainty to be updated recursively after each selection without retraining, reducing redundancy within an acquisition batch. On held-out rMD17 data, AdaptNTK achieves the highest mean correlations with force errors (Spearman 0.68, Pearson 0.71) and matches a three-member ensemble in error retention. In active learning experiments, AdaptNTK achieves the lowest force errors across rMD17 and Transition-1X, with particularly strong performance on transition-state configurations in Transition-1X. AdaptNTK provides a 2.6-fold speedup per Transition-1X cycle relative to the ensemble, providing efficient single-model uncertainty estimation with sequential updates for data-efficient active learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

22 of 43 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  2. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  4. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  5. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
  6. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
  7. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 555
  8. 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 467
  9. 2019Deep Evidential Regressioncited by 354
  10. 2022Learning Local Equivariant Representations for Large-Scale Atomistic Dynamicscited by 254
  11. 2020Machine Learning Force Fieldscited by 204
  12. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
10 more
  1. 2022A Framework and Benchmark for Deep Batch Active Learning for Regressioncited by 47
  2. 2022Transition1x -- a Dataset for Building Generalizable Reactive Machine Learning Potentialscited by 37
  3. 2023Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensemblescited by 30
  4. 2022Fast Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Learning Interatomic Potentialscited by 22
  5. 2025Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernelcited by 11
  6. 2024A prediction rigidity formalism for low-cost uncertainties in trained neural networkscited by 7
  7. 2025BLIPs: Bayesian Learned Interatomic Potentialscited by 6
  8. 2024LTAU-FF: Loss Trajectory Analysis for Uncertainty in Atomistic Force Fieldscited by 3
  9. 2026Pretrained Model Representations as Acquisition Signals for Active Learning of MLIPscited by 3
  10. 2026Force-Aware Neural Tangent Kernels for Scalable and Robust Active Learning of MLIPscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.