mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pretrained Model Representations as Acquisition Signals for Active Learning of MLIPs

arXiv 2605.03964 ↗First posted 5 May 2026cs.LG physics.chem-phcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) for reactive chemistry is often bottlenecked by the high cost of quantum chemical labels and the scarcity of transition state configurations in candidate pools. Active learning (AL) can mitigate these costs, but its effectiveness hinges on the acquisition rule. We investigate whether the latent space of a pretrained MLIP already contains the information necessary for effective acquisition, eliminating the need for auxiliary uncertainty heads, Bayesian training and fine-tuning, or committee ensembles. We introduce two acquisition signals derived directly from a pretrained MACE potential: a finite-width neural tangent kernel (NTK) and an activation kernel built from hidden latent space features. On reactive-chemistry benchmarks, both kernels consistently outperform fixed-descriptor baselines, committee disagreement, and random acquisition, reducing the data required to reach performance targets by an average of 38% for energy error and 28% for force error. We further show that the pretrained model induces similarity spaces that preserve chemically meaningful structure and provide more reliable residual uncertainty estimates than randomly initialised or fixed-descriptor-based kernels. Our results suggest that pretraining aligns latent-space geometry with model error, yielding a practical and sufficient acquisition signal for reactive MLIP fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.

Builds on

12 of 49 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 82
  2. 2019DScribe: Library of Descriptors for Machine Learning in Materials Sciencecited by 63
  3. 2022A Framework and Benchmark for Deep Batch Active Learning for Regressioncited by 49
  4. 2018Active Learning of Uniformly Accurate Inter-atomic Potentials for Materials Simulationcited by 37
  5. 2022Transition1x -- a Dataset for Building Generalizable Reactive Machine Learning Potentialscited by 37
  6. 2023Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensemblescited by 30
  7. 2025A practical guide to machine learning interatomic potentials -- Status and futurecited by 26
  8. 2022Fast Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Learning Interatomic Potentialscited by 22
  9. 2023Uncertainty-biased molecular dynamics for learning uniformly accurate interatomic potentialscited by 16
  10. 2020Committee neural network potentials control generalization errors and enable active learningcited by 15
  11. 2026Data Curation for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials by Determinantal Point Processescited by 3
  12. 2026Active Learning Strategies for Efficient Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials Across Diverse Material Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.