State Representation Learning for Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a novel state representation for reward-free Markov decision processes. The idea is to learn, in a self-supervised manner, an embedding space where distances between pairs of embedded states correspond to the minimum number of actions needed to transition between them. Compared to previous methods, our approach does not require any domain knowledge, learning from offline and unlabeled data. We show how this representation can be leveraged to learn goal-conditioned policies, providing a notion of similarity between states and goals and a useful heuristic distance to guide planning and reinforcement learning algorithms. Finally, we empirically validate our method in classic control domains and multi-goal environments, demonstrating that our method can successfully learn representations in large and/or continuous domains.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2022.
Builds on
7 of 14 references.
References · 7
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,096
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
- 2022Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning: Problems and Solutionscited by 145
- 2020Model-Based Visual Planning with Self-Supervised Functional Distancescited by 41
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pseudometric Learningcited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
11 papers.
- 2026Predictive but Not Plannable: RC-aux for Latent World Modelscited by 16
- 2025Dual Goal Representationscited by 13
- 2024Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning from Sub-Optimal Data on Metric Spacescited by 3
- 2026The Price Is Not Right: Neuro-Symbolic Methods Outperform VLAs on Structured Long-Horizon Manipulation Tasks with Significantly Lower Energy Consumptioncited by 1
- 2026Three Steps at a Time: Learning Representations from Action Sequences in Contrastive RLcited by 1
- 2023Asymmetric Norms to Approximate the Minimum Action Distancecited by 0
- 2024Learning telic-controllable state representationscited by 0
- 2025Learning The Minimum Action Distancecited by 0
- 2025Autonomous Learning From Success and Failure: Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning with Negative Feedbackcited by 0
- 2025Realizable Abstractions: Near-Optimal Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Geometry of Uncertainty: Learning Metric Spaces for Multimodal State Estimation in RLcited by 0
- 2026Three Steps at a Time: Learning Representations from Action Sequences in Contrastive RL31 Aug 2026
- 2026Predictive but Not Plannable: RC-aux for Latent World Models8 May 2026
- 2026The Price Is Not Right: Neuro-Symbolic Methods Outperform VLAs on Structured Long-Horizon Manipulation Tasks with Significantly Lower Energy Consumption22 Feb 2026
- 2026Geometry of Uncertainty: Learning Metric Spaces for Multimodal State Estimation in RL12 Feb 2026
- 2025Realizable Abstractions: Near-Optimal Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning4 Dec 2025
- 2025Dual Goal Representations8 Oct 2025
- 2025Autonomous Learning From Success and Failure: Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning with Negative Feedback3 Sep 2025
- 2025Learning The Minimum Action Distance10 Jun 2025
- 2024Learning telic-controllable state representations20 Jun 2024
- 2024Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning from Sub-Optimal Data on Metric Spaces16 Feb 2024
- 2023Asymmetric Norms to Approximate the Minimum Action Distance16 Dec 2023