Peer Oversight in Collective Decision Making
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This article introduces peer k-oversight, a property of sequential collective decision mechanisms requiring at least k agents to be responsible for every harmful outcome. It is shown that whenever k-oversight can be achieved by redistributing control over the decisions in a mechanism, it can be achieved using just k agents. A polynomial-time algorithm is also presented that determines whether such a redistribution exists and, when it does, constructs one. These results establish peer oversight as a tractable design principle for multiagent decision-making systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2026.
Builds on
5 of 25 references.
References · 5
- 2021A Game-Theoretic Account of Responsibility Allocationcited by 15
- 2019Blameworthiness in Security Gamescited by 3
- 2025Responsibility Gap in Collective Decision Makingcited by 2
- 2025Higher-Order Responsibilitycited by 2
- 2025A Graph-Theoretical Perspective on Law Design for Multiagent Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.