Blameworthiness in Security Games
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Security games are an example of a successful real-world application of game theory. The paper defines blameworthiness of the defender and the attacker in security games using the principle of alternative possibilities and provides a sound and complete logical system for reasoning about blameworthiness in such games. Two of the axioms of this system capture the asymmetry of information in security games.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Responsibility Gap in Collective Decision Makingcited by 2
- 2025Responsibility Gap and Diffusion in Sequential Decision-Making Mechanismscited by 2
- 2026Peer Oversight in Collective Decision Makingcited by 0
- 2026Peer Oversight in Collective Decision Making28 Aug 2026
- 2025Responsibility Gap and Diffusion in Sequential Decision-Making Mechanisms3 Jul 2025
- 2025Responsibility Gap in Collective Decision Making8 May 2025