Higher-Order Responsibility
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In ethics, individual responsibility is often defined through Frankfurt's principle of alternative possibilities. This definition is not adequate in a group decision-making setting because it often results in the lack of a responsible party or "responsibility gap''. One of the existing approaches to address this problem is to consider group responsibility. Another, recently proposed, approach is "higher-order'' responsibility. The paper considers the problem of deciding if higher-order responsibility up to degree d is enough to close the responsibility gap. The main technical result is that this problem is Pi2d+1-complete.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2025.
Builds on
1 of 30 references.
References · 1
- 2018Blameworthiness in Strategic Gamescited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.