mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Higher-Order Responsibility

arXiv 2506.01003 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2025cs.AI cs.CC cs.GTcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In ethics, individual responsibility is often defined through Frankfurt's principle of alternative possibilities. This definition is not adequate in a group decision-making setting because it often results in the lack of a responsible party or "responsibility gap''. One of the existing approaches to address this problem is to consider group responsibility. Another, recently proposed, approach is "higher-order'' responsibility. The paper considers the problem of deciding if higher-order responsibility up to degree d is enough to close the responsibility gap. The main technical result is that this problem is Pi2d+1-complete.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2025.

Builds on

1 of 30 references.

References · 1

  1. 2018Blameworthiness in Strategic Gamescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.