mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Game-Theoretic Account of Responsibility Allocation

arXiv 2105.09129 ↗First posted 19 May 2021cs.GT cs.LOcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When designing or analyzing multi-agent systems, a fundamental problem is responsibility ascription: to specify which agents are responsible for the joint outcome of their behaviors and to which extent. We model strategic multi-agent interaction as an extensive form game of imperfect information and define notions of forward (prospective) and backward (retrospective) responsibility. Forward responsibility identifies the responsibility of a group of agents for an outcome along all possible plays, whereas backward responsibility identifies the responsibility along a given play. We further distinguish between strategic and causal backward responsibility, where the former captures the epistemic knowledge of players along a play, while the latter formalizes which players -- possibly unknowingly -- caused the outcome. A formal connection between forward and backward notions is established in the case of perfect recall. We further ascribe quantitative responsibility through cooperative game theory. We show through a number of examples that our approach encompasses several prior formal accounts of responsibility attribution.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 May 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort: