ReViCo: Unveiling the Limitations of VLMs in Visual Text Understanding via Error Correction
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown great success in general visual tasks, yet they still struggle to deeply understand text within images. In this paper, we introduce ReViCo (Real Visual Correction), a benchmark designed to evaluate VLM text understanding through a novel task of visual text error correction. ReViCo challenges models to identify and fix text errors in real-world images, which requires a profound understanding of the interplay between visual text and its surrounding visual context. We benchmark various VLMs using two distinct paradigms: prompt-based strategy and targeted model training, both aimed at pushing the limits of current models. Our experiments reveal a striking performance gap between even the best VLMs and human, and further analysis also shows that most models struggle to accurately perceive the visual text, resulting in frequent correction errors. By highlighting these gaps, ReViCo provides a new benchmark foundation for developing more robust and text-aware VLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 21
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,718
- 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligencecited by 501
- 2019Scene Text Visual Question Answeringcited by 331
9 more
- 2024KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimizationcited by 264
- 2025MLLMs Know Where to Look: Training-free Perception of Small Visual Details with Multimodal LLMscited by 176
- 2020Spelling Error Correction with Soft-Masked BERTcited by 90
- 2020On the General Value of Evidence, and Bilingual Scene-Text Visual Question Answeringcited by 78
- 2020SpellGCN: Incorporating Phonological and Visual Similarities into Language Models for Chinese Spelling Checkcited by 57
- 2025Why Do MLLMs Struggle with Spatial Understanding? A Systematic Analysis from Data to Architecturecited by 30
- 2022CSCD-NS: a Chinese Spelling Check Dataset for Native Speakerscited by 13
- 2025Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Optical Character Recognition in Dynamic Video Environmentscited by 10
- 2025Mixture of Small and Large Models for Chinese Spelling Checkcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Building and better understanding vision-language models: insights and future directions
- 2025ReadBench: Measuring the Dense Text Visual Reading Ability of Vision-Language Models
- 2026VISTA-Bench: Do Vision-Language Models Really Understand Visualized Text as Well as Pure Text?
- 2026When VLMs Trust Context: Evaluating Scene Text Recognition under Misleading Context
- 2025Vision Language Models Are Not (Yet) Spelling Correctors
- 2025Trust the Model: Compact VLMs as In-Context Judges for Image-Text Data Quality
- 2023ReForm-Eval: Evaluating Large Vision Language Models via Unified Re-Formulation of Task-Oriented Benchmarks
- 2025Text2VLM: Adapting Text-Only Datasets to Evaluate Alignment Training in Visual Language Models