Muon with Finite Newton-Schulz: The Smoothing Benefit in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Muon has emerged as a strong optimizer for the matrix-valued parameters in large language model pretraining, approximately orthogonalizing its momentum with a few Newton-Schulz iterations. Existing theory either replaces this iteration with the exact polar factor it approximates, or treats its finite depth as an approximation error, and thus the iteration Muon actually runs can only hurt the guarantees. We show that finite Newton-Schulz can instead be beneficial for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. To this end, we analyze Muon through the online-to-nonconvex conversion, which views the update rule as an online learner and converts its regret bound into a stationarity guarantee. The finite Newton-Schulz iteration smooths the discontinuous polar map into a Lipschitz map of the singular values, and Muon with finite Newton-Schulz can be regarded as an online learner with a smoothed spectral potential. This smoothing is exactly what the conversion needs: we prove that a Newton-Schulz depth growing only logarithmically in the target accuracy suffices for convergence to stationary points in nonsmooth nonconvex optimization, whereas Muon with the exact-polar update may fail to converge. The resulting sample complexity bounds match the best-known guarantees for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization and are optimal for smooth nonconvex optimization up to problem-dependent factors. The argument extends beyond Newton-Schulz to general spectral maps with the same smoothing property.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.
Builds on
40 of 58 references.
References · 40
- 2025Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligencecited by 523
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 381
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 303
- 2025Training Deep Learning Models with Norm-Constrained LMOscited by 177
- 2024Old Optimizer, New Norm: An Anthologycited by 173
- 2017Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points Icited by 125
- 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
- 2025The Polar Express: Optimal Matrix Sign Methods and Their Application to the Muon Algorithmcited by 104
- 2025Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find Themcited by 87
- 2025Understanding Gradient Orthogonalization for Deep Learning via Non-Euclidean Trust-Region Optimizationcited by 81
- 2025A Note on the Convergence of Muoncited by 78
- 2025Muon Optimizes Under Spectral Norm Constraintscited by 77
28 more
- 2024Modular Duality in Deep Learningcited by 71
- 2023Optimal Stochastic Non-smooth Non-convex Optimization through Online-to-Non-convex Conversioncited by 42
- 2021Oracle Complexity in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 38
- 2025Lions and Muons: Optimization via Stochastic Frank-Wolfe under Heavy-Tailed Noisecited by 38
- 2025Implicit Bias of Spectral Descent and Muon on Multiclass Separable Datacited by 33
- 2026Convergence of Muon with Newton-Schulzcited by 30
- 2026Preconditioning Benefits of Spectral Orthogonalization in Muoncited by 28
- 2025When do spectral gradient updates help in deep learning?cited by 25
- 2014Online Linear Optimization via Smoothingcited by 23
- 2024Understanding Adam Optimizer via Online Learning of Updates: Adam is FTRL in Disguisecited by 23
- 2025Beyond the Ideal: Analyzing the Inexact Muon Updatecited by 23
- 2024Adam with model exponential moving average is effective for nonconvex optimizationcited by 22
- 2024Random Scaling and Momentum for Non-smooth Non-convex Optimizationcited by 18
- 2023Stability-penalty-adaptive follow-the-regularized-leader: Sparsity, game-dependency, and best-of-both-worldscited by 15
- 2024General framework for online-to-nonconvex conversion: Schedule-free SGD is also effective for nonconvex optimizationcited by 14
- 2025Online Convex Optimization with Heavy Tails: Old Algorithms, New Regrets, and Applicationscited by 13
- 2026Insights on Muon from Simple Quadraticscited by 11
- 2026Delving into Muon and Beyond: Deep Analysis and Extensionscited by 9
- 2026Adaptive Matrix Online Learning through Smoothing with Guarantees for Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 9
- 2026Muon Does Not Converge on Convex Lipschitz Functionscited by 9
- 2026Muon with Nesterov Momentum: Heavy-Tailed Noise and (Randomized) Inexact Polar Decompositioncited by 8
- 2026Spectral Gradient Descent Mitigates Anisotropy-Driven Misalignment: A Case Study in Phase Retrievalcited by 5
- 2026Enhancing LLM Training via Spectral Clippingcited by 5
- 2025Improving Online-to-Nonconvex Conversion for Smooth Optimization via Double Optimismcited by 3
- 2026Move on Muon : A Hamiltonian probability gradient flow perspective of Muon optimizercited by 3
- 2026Softsign: Smooth Sign in Your Optimizer For Better Parameter Heterogeneity Handlingcited by 3
- 2026DynMuon: A Dynamic Spectral Shaping View of Muoncited by 2
- 2026Denoise First, Orthogonalize Later: Understanding Momentum in Muon via Spectral Filteringcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Musec: MomentUm SpEctral Clipping for Stable Muon-type Trainingcited by 1
- 2026The Exponential Price of Determinism in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Convergence of Practical Muon with Finite Newton-Schulz Iterations and Nesterov Momentumcited by 0
- 2026Composite Online-to-Nonconvex Conversion with Optimal Oracle Complexitycited by 0
- 2026Composite Online-to-Nonconvex Conversion with Optimal Oracle Complexity8 Oct 2026
- 2026Convergence of Practical Muon with Finite Newton-Schulz Iterations and Nesterov Momentum30 Sep 2026
- 2026The Exponential Price of Determinism in Nonsmooth Nonconvex Optimization20 Sep 2026
- 2026Musec: MomentUm SpEctral Clipping for Stable Muon-type Training10 Sep 2026