mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse Koopman Autoencoders Identify Local Dynamical Regimes in Multibasin Systems

arXiv 2608.29057 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2026cs.LG math.DScited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Koopman autoencoders (KAEs) seek a higher-dimensional latent representation in which nonlinear dynamics evolve linearly. However, many interesting systems have multiple basins of attraction, and both theoretical and empirical work has shown these multibasin systems cannot generally admit a single finite-dimensional global Koopman embedding under standard assumptions. We posit that encoders with a sparsity-inducing objective encouraging few active latent coefficients will provide latent supports as an inspectable basin-modeling principle for Koopman autoencoders. We use these encoders producing sparse latents in training Sparse Koopman Autoencoders (SKAEs) without basin labels or other regime annotations, and treat the learned latent supports as model-produced regime variables after training. Across a range of procedurally generated multibasin systems and chaotic flows, we show that SKAEs have superior forecasting performance compared to dense-latent KAEs. We also perform a mechanistic study that shows latent supports produced by SKAEs are both essential for the quality of the representation and useful for identifying basins on basin-interior states, whereas dense-latent KAEs collapse to an uninformative single support family. These results identify sparse latents and their corresponding supports as label-free, interpretable regime variables for Koopman learning in nonlinear systems with multiple local dynamical laws.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 36 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipicecited by 807
  2. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 494
  3. 2021Modern Koopman Theory for Dynamical Systemscited by 276
  4. 2017Learning Koopman Invariant Subspaces for Dynamic Mode Decompositioncited by 158
  5. 2017Linearly-Recurrent Autoencoder Networks for Learning Dynamicscited by 145
  6. 2016Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive controlcited by 140
  7. 2020Forecasting Sequential Data using Consistent Koopman Autoencoderscited by 115
  8. 2021Chaos as an interpretable benchmark for forecasting and data-driven modellingcited by 88
  9. 2023Model scale versus domain knowledge in statistical forecasting of chaotic systemscited by 27
  10. 2022Deep Koopman Operator with Control for Nonlinear Systemscited by 25
  11. 2020Ada-LISTA: Learned Solvers Adaptive to Varying Modelscited by 22
  12. 2021Hyperparameter Tuning is All You Need for LISTAcited by 22
5 more
  1. 2026LpWM: A Case for Sparse Representations in World Modelscited by 8
  2. 2023On the lifting and reconstruction of nonlinear systems with multiple invariant setscited by 4
  3. 2019Existence and uniqueness of global Koopman eigenfunctions for stable fixed points and periodic orbitscited by 2
  4. 2023Course Correcting Koopman Representationscited by 2
  5. 2023Properties of Immersions for Systems with Multiple Limit Sets with Implications to Learning Koopman Embeddingscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.