From Sequence to Structure: Relational Uncertainty Propagation for LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable uncertainty quantification (UQ) is essential for deploying large language model (LLM) agents in complex interactive environments. Existing UQ methods largely rely on local signals, such as token probabilities, predictive entropy, or per-step confidence, and therefore overlook the long-range dependencies through which errors accumulate across an execution trajectory. As a result, they may fail to identify agent failures whose causes originate several reasoning or interaction steps before the final answer. We propose RUPA (Relational Uncertainty Propagation for Agents), a trajectory-level UQ framework for LLM agents. RUPA represents an execution history as a directed trajectory graph in which reasoning states, tool interactions, and environment feedback are nodes connected by temporal and semantic dependency edges. It then propagates uncertainty over this graph to capture how execution risk accumulates and transfers across interaction steps. The propagated signal is combined with trajectory-level behavioral features and goal-alignment information to produce a confidence estimate for the full agent trajectory. We evaluate RUPA on representative agent benchmarks, including τ-2, Terminal-Bench-2, and GAIA, using 6 open-source LLMs spanning multiple model families. Experimental results show that RUPA consistently outperforms existing UQ methods by providing more accurate uncertainty estimates, enabling earlier failure detection, and improving uncertainty-guided agent execution across diverse agent tasks. These results demonstrate that explicitly modeling relational dependency is crucial to reliable UQ for long-horizon LLM agents, providing a practical foundation for trustworthy agent execution.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 36 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.
Builds on
36 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026DenoiseFlow: Uncertainty-Aware Denoising for Reliable LLM Agentic Workflows28 Feb
- 2026TRACER: Trajectory Risk Aggregation for Critical Episodes in Agentic Reasoning11 Feb
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agents: Foundations, Emerging Challenges, and Opportunities4 Feb
- 2025UProp: Investigating the Uncertainty Propagation of LLMs in Multi-Step Agentic Decision-Making20 Jun
- 2025Position: Uncertainty Quantification Needs Reassessment for Large-language Model Agents28 May
- 2024Towards Uncertainty-Aware Language Agent25 Jan
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug
Other references · 29
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 751
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
- 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 585
17 more
- 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 445
- 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 259
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Models in Medicine: Progress, Application, and Challengecited by 124
- 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 117
- 2024On Verbalized Confidence Scores for LLMscited by 83
- 2025Reasoning Models Better Express Their Confidencecited by 65
- 2025Confidence Is All You Need: Few-Shot RL Fine-Tuning of Language Modelscited by 62
- 2025Adaptive Retrieval Without Self-Knowledge? Bringing Uncertainty Back Homecited by 33
- 2024Rowen: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Hallucination Mitigation in LLMscited by 27
- 2024Do LLMs estimate uncertainty well in instruction-following?cited by 26
- 2026Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewardscited by 14
- 2026Confidence Estimation for LLMs in Multi-turn Interactionscited by 12
- 2026SELAUR: Self Evolving LLM Agent via Uncertainty-aware Rewardscited by 9
- 2026Recurrent Confidence Chain: Temporal-Aware Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026AgentGL: Towards Agentic Graph Learning with LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2026Integrating Graphs, Large Language Models, and Agents: Reasoning and Retrievalcited by 1
- 2026Confidence Laundering in Agent Systems: Why Uncertainty Needs a Latent Carriercited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PropUQ-MAS: Propagation-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Beyond Single-Turn Confidence: Trajectory-Adapted Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents
- 2026Every Response Counts: Quantifying Uncertainty of LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems through Tensor Decomposition
- 2026GRUET: Quantifying Uncertainty of Agentic Reasoning-and-Acting Processes
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study
- 2026Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents
- 2026Information Fidelity in Tool-Using LLM Agents: A Martingale Analysis of the Model Context Protocol
- 2025Multi-Mission Tool Bench: Assessing the Robustness of LLM based Agents through Related and Dynamic Missions