mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DenoiseFlow: Uncertainty-Aware Denoising for Reliable LLM Agentic Workflows

arXiv 2603.00532 ↗First posted 28 Feb 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Diffusion reasoning and test-time scaling

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Autonomous agents are increasingly entrusted with complex, long-horizon tasks, ranging from mathematical reasoning to software generation. While agentic workflows facilitate these tasks by decomposing them into multi-step reasoning chains, reliability degrades significantly as the sequence lengthens. Specifically, minor interpretation errors in natural-language instructions tend to compound silently across steps. We term this failure mode accumulated semantic ambiguity. Existing approaches to mitigate this often lack runtime adaptivity, relying instead on static exploration budgets, reactive error recovery, or single-path execution that ignores uncertainty entirely. We formalize the multi-step reasoning process as a Noisy MDP and propose DenoiseFlow, a closed-loop framework that performs progressive denoising through three coordinated stages: (1)Sensing estimates per-step semantic uncertainty; (2)Regulating adaptively allocates computation by routing between fast single-path execution and parallel exploration based on estimated risk; and (3)Correcting performs targeted recovery via influence-based root-cause localization. Online self-calibration continuously aligns decision boundaries with verifier feedback, requiring no ground-truth labels. Experiments on six benchmarks spanning mathematical reasoning, code generation, and multi-hop QA show that DenoiseFlow achieves the highest accuracy on every benchmark (83.3% average, +1.3% over the strongest baseline) while reducing cost by 40--56% through adaptive branching. Detailed ablation studies further confirm framework-level's robustness and generality. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/DenoiseFlow-21D3/.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion reasoning and test-time scaling, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2026.

Builds on

19 of 36 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  6. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  7. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  8. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  9. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,155
  10. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  11. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,359
  12. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
7 more
  1. 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,020
  2. 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 883
  3. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
  4. 2024Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Sciencecited by 222
  5. 2023TaskMatrix.AI: Completing Tasks by Connecting Foundation Models with Millions of APIscited by 184
  6. 2024Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Surveycited by 157
  7. 2026JudgeFlow: Agentic Workflow Optimization via Block Judgecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Semantic Reasoning Denoising: Correcting Language Model Reasoning with Semantic Operators
  2. 2026DenoiseRL: Bootstrapping Reasoning Models to Recover from Noisy Prefixes
  3. 2025EDIT: Early Diffusion Inference Termination for dLLMs Based on Dynamics of Training Gradients
  4. 2026AgentNoiseBench: Benchmarking Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents Under Noisy Condition
  5. 2025Taming Uncertainty via Automation: Observing, Analyzing, and Optimizing Agentic AI Systems
  6. 2026Tools as Continuous Flow for Evolving Agentic Reasoning
  7. 2025Reasoning in Diffusion Large Language Models is Concentrated in Dynamic Confusion Zones
  8. 2026Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents