Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent position papers argue that the classical aleatoric/epistemic uncertainty framework is insufficient for interactive large language model (LLM) agents and call for underspecification-aware, decomposed, and communicable uncertainty representations that can unlock new agent capabilities such as proactive clarification seeking and shared mental-model building. Practical deployment constraints -- black-box APIs, interactive latency budgets, and the absence of labeled trajectories -- rule out logprob-based, multi-sampling, and training-based methods, leaving prompt-based estimation as the most viable family for surfacing such signals at deployment time. We answer this call with a simple prompt-based decomposition that separates action confidence from request uncertainty (u), enabling the agent to ask for clarification when the task specification is ambiguous. To evaluate it, we introduce two clarification-augmented benchmarks (WebShop-Clarification and ALFWorld-Clarification) in which 50% of tasks are deliberately underspecified, and systematically compare the proposed decomposition against ReAct+UE and Uncertainty-Aware Memory (UAM) across five LLM backbones (GPT-5.1, DeepSeek-v3.2-exp, GLM-4.7, Qwen3.5-35B, GPT-OSS-120B) on these variants together with the standard WebShop, ALFWorld, and REAL benchmarks for fault detection. Averaged across the five backbones, the proposed decomposition improves clarification F1 on ALFWorld-Clarification by 73% over ReAct+UE and by 36% over UAM, and leads clarification F1 on every backbone on WebShop-Clarification and on four of five backbones on ALFWorld-Clarification, indicating that the gains generalize beyond a single LLM.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 39 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
39 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 13
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Agentic Uncertainty Reveals Agentic Overconfidence6 Feb
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification in LLM Agents: Foundations, Emerging Challenges, and Opportunities4 Feb
- 2026Agentic Uncertainty Quantification22 Jan
- 2025Structured Uncertainty guided Clarification for LLM Agents11 Nov
- 2025BrowseConf: Confidence-Guided Test-Time Scaling for Web Agents27 Oct
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Survey29 Jul
- 2025Because we have LLMs, we Can and Should Pursue Agentic Interpretability13 Jun
- 2025Position: Uncertainty Quantification Needs Reassessment for Large-language Model Agents28 May
- 2025Tools in the Loop: Quantifying Uncertainty of LLM Question Answering Systems That Use Tools22 May
- 2024Confidence Calibration and Rationalization for LLMs via Multi-Agent Deliberation14 Apr
- 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey5 Feb
- 2024Towards Uncertainty-Aware Language Agent25 Jan
Other references · 26
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2022WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language Agentscited by 1,251
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
- 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 293
- 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 211
14 more
- 2024Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similaritiescited by 159
- 2023Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Modelscited by 150
- 2023LM-Polygraph: Uncertainty Estimation for Language Modelscited by 131
- 2023Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensemblingcited by 114
- 2025A Survey of Uncertainty Estimation Methods on Large Language Modelscited by 62
- 2023Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation: From Theory to Applicationscited by 61
- 2024Rethinking Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 42
- 2024Improving Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models via Semantic Embeddingscited by 30
- 2024DeLLMa: Decision Making Under Uncertainty with Large Language Modelscited by 21
- 2025MICE for CATs: Model-Internal Confidence Estimation for Calibrating Agents with Toolscited by 15
- 2025Uncertainty-Aware GUI Agent: Adaptive Perception through Component Recommendation and Human-in-the-Loop Refinementcited by 15
- 2025Enhancing Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs with Expectation of Aggregated Internal Beliefcited by 9
- 2025Addressing Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Uncertainty Estimation Methods for Natural Language Generationcited by 7
- 2025PlanU: Large Language Model Reasoning through Planning under Uncertaintycited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026When Personal Memory Has No Single Answer: Evaluating LLM Agents under Irreducible Conflictcited by 1
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Studycited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agents30 Sep 2026
- 2026Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study7 Sep 2026
- 2026When Personal Memory Has No Single Answer: Evaluating LLM Agents under Irreducible Conflict14 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Uncertainty-Aware Clarification in LLM Agents with Information Gain
- 2026Ask or Assume? Uncertainty-Aware Clarification-Seeking in Coding Agents
- 2026CAR-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of LLM Agents under Real-World Uncertainty
- 2025Can Code Language Models Learn Clarification-Seeking Behaviors?
- 2026From Answers to Interpretations: Rethinking Ambiguity-Induced Aleatoric Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs
- 2026From Sequence to Structure: Relational Uncertainty Propagation for LLM Agents
- 2026ASK in the Dark: Uncertainty-Gated LLM Assistance under Partial Observability
- 2024Controlling Large Language Model Agents with Entropic Activation Steering