mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dear Algo: A Precision-First Agentic Intent Layer for Unified Search and Recommendation

arXiv 2608.15877 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Search and recommendation serve a shared discovery objective but encode intent differently. We study this boundary through Dear Algo on Threads, a deployed product where open-ended requests such as more NBA news or less politics steer subsequent feed recommendations rather than return a one-shot result list. Its agentic intent layer compiles explicit, inferred, negative, and compound intent into a grounded executable plan, then invokes conventional retrieval and optional semantic or multimodal reranking. The layer shares an intent-to-retrieval contract without requiring one model or serving path across search-like and recommendation-like modes. We evaluate Dear Algo under a precision-first objective. In a blinded audit of 300 public request-item pairs (296 evaluable), a strict categorical LLM-as-a-judge gate achieved 94.4% exact-Relevant precision [88.8%, 98.9%]. Across 72 normalized request clusters, the full configuration produced 7.73 judge-qualified candidates per 20 slots versus 6.61 for an LLM-derived-query baseline, a gain of 1.11 [0.12, 2.12]. In a candidate-randomized serving-path study restricted to the reranker path's first 72 eligible hours, the user-weighted judge-Irrelevant share among judged admissions was 2.80% versus 4.78% off (-1.97 points [-3.02, -0.94]), while Exact-Relevant share was 2.24 points higher [0.08, 4.41]. Together, these studies show how explicit natural-language intent can be carried into feed recommendation under a precision-first evaluation framework

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 41 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2026.

Builds on

41 of 79 references.

References · 41

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  4. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
  5. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,085
  6. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
  7. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  8. 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
  9. 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 575
  10. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 517
  11. 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 424
  12. 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 411
29 more
  1. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
  2. 2022Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search Indexcited by 247
  3. 2024LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Taskscited by 243
  4. 2023Recommendation as Instruction Following: A Large Language Model Empowered Recommendation Approachcited by 168
  5. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 157
  6. 2020A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systemscited by 143
  7. 2023Recommender AI Agent: Integrating Large Language Models for Interactive Recommendationscited by 131
  8. 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 131
  9. 2017How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utilitycited by 120
  10. 2024Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreementcited by 105
  11. 2023Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgmentcited by 85
  12. 2020Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching Approachcited by 32
  13. 2024ACORN: Performant and Predicate-Agnostic Search Over Vector Embeddings and Structured Datacited by 32
  14. 2024Don't Use LLMs to Make Relevance Judgmentscited by 26
  15. 2024Transparent and Scrutable Recommendations Using Natural Language User Profilescited by 24
  16. 2024Aligning Large Language Models for Controllable Recommendationscited by 19
  17. 2023When Search Meets Recommendation: Learning Disentangled Search Representation for Recommendationcited by 17
  18. 2023KuaiSAR: A Unified Search And Recommendation Datasetcited by 15
  19. 2025Benchmarking LLM-based Relevance Judgment Methodscited by 14
  20. 2025Semantic IDs for Joint Generative Search and Recommendationcited by 14
  21. 2024UniSAR: Modeling User Transition Behaviors between Search and Recommendationcited by 12
  22. 2025Interactive Recommendation Agent with Active User Commandscited by 10
  23. 2021USER: A Unified Information Search and Recommendation Model based on Integrated Behavior Sequencecited by 9
  24. 2018Joint Modeling and Optimization of Search and Recommendationcited by 7
  25. 2023Learning from Negative User Feedback and Measuring Responsiveness for Sequential Recommenderscited by 7
  26. 2024Bridging Search and Recommendation in Generative Retrieval: Does One Task Help the Other?cited by 7
  27. 2026Agentic Recommender System with Hierarchical Belief-State Memorycited by 5
  28. 2025CTRL-Rec: Controlling Recommender Systems With Natural Languagecited by 4
  29. 2024Unified Dual-Intent Translation for Joint Modeling of Search and Recommendationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026HotelQuEST: Balancing Quality and Efficiency in Agentic Search
  2. 2026RRCM: Ranking-Driven Retrieval over Collaborative and Meta Memories for LLM Recommendation
  3. 2025A Survey of Large Language Model Empowered Agents for Recommendation and Search: Towards Next-Generation Information Retrieval
  4. 2026Improving Item Discoverability in e-Commerce Search via Related Intent Generation
  5. 2025ARAG: Agentic Retrieval Augmented Generation for Personalized Recommendation
  6. 2025RAVine: Reality-Aligned Evaluation for Agentic Search
  7. 2026Agentic Multi-Source Grounding for Enhanced Query Intent Understanding: A DoorDash Case Study
  8. 2026RGAlign-Rec: Ranking-Guided Alignment for Latent Query Reasoning in Recommendation Systems