Synchronized Logit Steering: Real-world Steganography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Steganography in large language models offers a way to embed hidden messages within natural-sounding text. Existing token and logit-level methods typically require the sender and receiver to share an identical prompt context, which is rarely guaranteed in production pipelines that use retrieval-augmented generation or proprietary system instructions. We introduce Synchronized Logit Steering (SLS), a deterministic steganographic scheme that eliminates this dependency by deriving a proxy prompt from the generated output itself, allowing both parties to reconstruct the same logit distribution without access to the original prompt. SLS encodes payload values as token ranks within high-entropy regions of the proxy prompt distribution, and we extend the scheme with periodic recurrence and payload bursts to scale information density. Across ShareGPT, GSM8K, and SWE-bench Verified, we show that the KL divergence between the true and proxy prompt distributions falls below 0.5 nats once the synchronization window reaches 40 tokens, and SLS encoding does not meaningfully disrupt this convergence relative to greedy generation. We also find that the periodic-burst variant achieves 0.20 bits per token, or roughly 10x the capacity of single-payload encoding. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests further confirm that SLS outputs are statistically difficult to distinguish from greedy generations, demonstrating that covert, prompt-agnostic communication through LLMs is both practical and stealthy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
References · 14
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,916
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,221
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,274
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,968
- 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 76
- 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 55
- 2024Generative Text Steganography with Large Language Modelcited by 17
- 2025The Steganographic Potentials of Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Robust Steganography from Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024Semantic Steganography: A Framework for Robust and High-Capacity Information Hiding using Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024Large Language Models as Carriers of Hidden Messagescited by 2
- 2025Auto-Stega: An Agent-Driven System for Lifelong Strategy Evolution in LLM-Based Text Steganographycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Hide and Seek in Embedding Space: Geometry-based Steganography and Detection in Large Language Models
- 2026Feedback Coding Enables Inference-Time Covert Agentic Communication
- 2026TI-StegoAlign: Channel-Guided Post-Training for Generative Text Steganography under Tokenization Inconsistency ↗
- 2023Stable Messenger: Steganography for Message-Concealed Image Generation
- 2025SparSamp: Efficient Provably Secure Steganography Based on Sparse Sampling
- 2025Addressing Tokenization Inconsistency in Steganography and Watermarking Based on Large Language Models
- 2026Now You (Still) See Me: Detecting Evasive Steganographic Payloads in LLMs
- 2026StegoMemory: Agentic Memory Acts as Covert Steganographic Channel