mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hide and Seek in Embedding Space: Geometry-based Steganography and Detection in Large Language Models

arXiv 2601.22818 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Steering and probing for LLM safety

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuned LLMs can covertly encode prompt secrets into outputs via steganographic channels. Prior work demonstrated this threat but relied on trivially recoverable encodings. We formalize payload recoverability via classifier accuracy and show previous schemes achieve 100% recoverability. In response, we introduce low-recoverability steganography, replacing arbitrary mappings with embedding-space-derived ones. For Llama-8B (LoRA) and Ministral-8B (LoRA) trained on TrojanStego prompts, exact secret recovery rises from 17rightarrow30% (+78%) and 24rightarrow43% (+80%) respectively, while on Llama-70B (LoRA) trained on Wiki prompts, it climbs from 9rightarrow19% (+123%), all while reducing payload recoverability. We then discuss detection. We argue that detecting fine-tuning-based steganographic attacks requires approaches beyond traditional steganalysis. Standard approaches measure distributional shift, which is an expected side-effect of fine-tuning. Instead, we propose a mechanistic interpretability approach: linear probes trained on later-layer activations detect the secret with up to 33% higher accuracy in fine-tuned models compared to base models, even for low-recoverability schemes. This suggests that malicious fine-tuning leaves actionable internal signatures amenable to interpretability-based defenses.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Steering and probing for LLM safety, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 32 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

32 of 51 references.

References · 32

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  8. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  9. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  10. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  11. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  12. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
20 more
  1. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 906
  2. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
  3. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
  4. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  5. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  6. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
  7. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
  8. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  9. 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 328
  10. 2023Universal Jailbreak Backdoors from Poisoned Human Feedbackcited by 128
  11. 2024LoRA vs Full Fine-tuning: An Illusion of Equivalencecited by 109
  12. 2023Backdoor Attacks for In-Context Learning with Language Modelscited by 96
  13. 2024Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptationcited by 80
  14. 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 78
  15. 2019Towards Near-imperceptible Steganographic Textcited by 32
  16. 2025Towards Safeguarding LLM Fine-tuning APIs against Cipher Attackscited by 11
  17. 2025SeedPrints: Fingerprints Can Even Tell Which Seed Your Large Language Model Was Trained Fromcited by 10
  18. 2025TrojanStego: Your Language Model Can Secretly Be A Steganographic Privacy Leaking Agentcited by 9
  19. 2025Addressing Tokenization Inconsistency in Steganography and Watermarking Based on Large Language Modelscited by 4
  20. 2024State-of-the-art Advances of Deep-learning Linguistic Steganalysis Researchcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Synchronized Logit Steering: Real-world Steganography
  2. 2026Feedback Coding Enables Inference-Time Covert Agentic Communication
  3. 2026StegoMemory: Agentic Memory Acts as Covert Steganographic Channel
  4. 2025Hiding in Plain Sight: A Steganographic Approach to Stealthy LLM Jailbreaks
  5. 2025SteganoBackdoor: Evading Data-Poisoning Defenses via Steganographic Backdoors
  6. 2026VectorSmuggle: Steganographic Exfiltration in Embedding Stores and a Cryptographic Provenance Defense
  7. 2024Excuse me, sir? Your language model is leaking (information)
  8. 2026Invisible Safety Threat: Malicious Finetuning for LLM via Steganography