mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Now You (Still) See Me: Detecting Evasive Steganographic Payloads in LLMs

arXiv 2606.09411 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.CR cs.IT cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models can be fine-tuned to encode prompt-borne secrets into fluent, seemingly benign outputs. This creates a steganographic exfiltration risk that is difficult to detect with output-level steganalysis. Recent work proposes mechanistic detection using linear probes that recover the secret from internal activations. We show that this defense can be systematically evaded, but that detectability can be recovered through a targeted data-level intervention. First, we extend the detection setup to include a non-linear MLP probe. We then adversarially fine-tune steganographic trojans across five base models: Qwen3-8B, Llama-3.1-8B, Ministral-8B, Qwen3-14B, and Phi-4-14B. The resulting models retain 58--79% exact-match secret recovery while evading both ridge and held-out MLP probes, with 1--8% average capability degradation across six benchmarks. We then give an information-theoretic characterization of this evasion. Successful evasion preserves recoverability while reducing low-order extractability of the secret from the content-aligned representation, forcing the payload into synergistic interaction with residual degrees of freedom. This motivates a recontextualization dataset that restricts these residual degrees of freedom. On this distribution, both ridge and MLP detectability are restored across all five evasive trojans. Overall, our findings show that activation-based steganography detection is vulnerable to adaptive evasion, but also that theory-guided evaluation distributions can expose otherwise hidden payloads.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

27 of 47 references.

References · 27

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  4. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  6. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  7. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  8. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  9. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
  10. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
  11. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 735
  12. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
15 more
  1. 2023LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed formcited by 267
  2. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 207
  3. 2022Linear Adversarial Concept Erasurecited by 101
  4. 2024Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptationcited by 80
  5. 2019Neural Linguistic Steganographycited by 78
  6. 2024Obfuscated Activations Bypass LLM Latent-Space Defensescited by 45
  7. 2022Perfectly Secure Steganography Using Minimum Entropy Couplingcited by 44
  8. 2025The Non-Linear Representation Dilemma: Is Causal Abstraction Enough for Mechanistic Interpretability?cited by 37
  9. 2025Language Models are Injective and Hence Invertiblecited by 35
  10. 2025RL-Obfuscation: Can Language Models Learn to Evade Latent-Space Monitors?cited by 24
  11. 2025TrojanStego: Your Language Model Can Secretly Be A Steganographic Privacy Leaking Agentcited by 9
  12. 2025Neural Chameleons: Language Models Can Learn to Hide Their Thoughts from Unseen Activation Monitorscited by 9
  13. 2024OD-Stega: LLM-Based Relatively Secure Steganography via Optimized Distributionscited by 5
  14. 2017Disentangled Representations via Synergy Minimizationcited by 2
  15. 2026Hide and Seek in Embedding Space: Geometry-based Steganography and Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SteganoBackdoor: Evading Data-Poisoning Defenses via Steganographic Backdoors
  2. 2025Verifying LLM Inference to Detect Model Weight Exfiltration
  3. 2026A Decision-Theoretic Formalisation of Steganography With Applications to LLM Monitoring
  4. 2026VectorSmuggle: Steganographic Exfiltration in Embedding Stores and a Cryptographic Provenance Defense
  5. 2026Cordyceps: Covert Control Attacks on LLMs via Data Poisoning
  6. 2025Hiding in Plain Sight: A Steganographic Approach to Stealthy LLM Jailbreaks
  7. 2026Feedback Coding Enables Inference-Time Covert Agentic Communication
  8. 2026StegoMemory: Agentic Memory Acts as Covert Steganographic Channel