mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal Effect on CVR with Targeted Regularization

arXiv 2608.13461 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Post-click conversion rate (CVR) is a key metric in various scenarios including e-commerce and advertising, reflecting the efficiency and user experience in the second stage of the conversion process. Estimating the causal effect on CVR is therefore of great practical importance. However, directly applying existing causal inference methods to clicked samples introduces sample selection bias and increased variance due to the exclusion of non-click data. Recent studies on CVR prediction introduce "ideal loss", which optimizes model parameters using an unbiased estimate of the loss over the full sample. Nevertheless, there is no guarantee that unbiasedness of the loss implies unbiasedness of the final estimator. We revisit this challenge from the perspective of semiparametric theory. Specifically, we develop a new doubly robust causal effect estimator for chain-structured outcomes such as CVR, and derive its theoretical properties in detail. It achieves a faster convergence rate compared to nuisance parameters estimation and is therefore more robust when using flexible nonparametric estimators, including neural networks. Based on these theoretical findings, we further design a framework based on targeted regularization to improve numerical stability and practical applicability. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of our method. In addition, we find that naively combining loss debiasing with standard causal estimators underperforms our method, highlighting the necessity of developing the new estimator tailored to this CVR-style objective with solid theoretical guarantees.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.

Builds on

20 of 44 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 408
  2. 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 328
  3. 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 327
  4. 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 285
  5. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  6. 2018Entire Space Multi-Task Model: An Effective Approach for Estimating Post-Click Conversion Ratecited by 172
  7. 2022Diffusion Causal Models for Counterfactual Estimationcited by 87
  8. 2020Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 78
  9. 2017Double/Debiased/Neyman Machine Learning of Treatment Effectscited by 76
  10. 2015Nonparametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effectscited by 62
  11. 2021VCNet and Functional Targeted Regularization For Learning Causal Effects of Continuous Treatmentscited by 59
  12. 2020Counterfactual Representation Learning with Balancing Weightscited by 45
8 more
  1. 2018Learning Weighted Representations for Generalization Across Designscited by 41
  2. 2019Large-scale Causal Approaches to Debiasing Post-click Conversion Rate Estimation with Multi-task Learningcited by 39
  3. 2023Explicit Feature Interaction-aware Uplift Network for Online Marketingcited by 25
  4. 2024Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learningcited by 19
  5. 2022A Generalized Doubly Robust Learning Framework for Debiasing Post-Click Conversion Rate Predictioncited by 18
  6. 2021A Large Scale Benchmark for Individual Treatment Effect Prediction and Uplift Modelingcited by 12
  7. 2023Adversarially Balanced Representation for Continuous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 10
  8. 2024Entire Chain Uplift Modeling with Context-Enhanced Learning for Intelligent Marketingcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.