Beyond Outcome Rewards: Step-Level Self-Distilled Policy Optimization for Deep Search Agents
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep search agents operate over trajectories spanning dozens of steps, yet standard reinforcement learning provides only a single outcome reward per trajectory, which is far too sparse for effective credit assignment. On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) addresses this by using the model's own logits as dense token-level teachers, but extending it to search agents introduces a fundamental tension: the teacher, having access to privileged information such as the correct answer, produces a distribution that differs systematically from the student's exploration-based reasoning, and naive distillation causes the student to inherit this information asymmetry rather than learn better search strategies. We resolve this tension through two contributions. First, we construct Evidence Anchors, which are concise, step-level evidence snippets extracted from the web, as privileged information that captures key reasoning steps without revealing the entire answer path. Second, we propose Step-Level Self-Distilled Policy Optimization (SSPO), which converts teacher-student disagreement into step-level advantage weights within GRPO, applied exclusively to incorrect trajectories. This design decouples what to update from how much to update: the outcome reward determines the direction of policy change, while the teacher modulates its magnitude at each step. Correct trajectories are left untouched, preserving their diversity. On Qwen3-8B, SSPO consistently outperforms GRPO across BrowseComp, GAIA, and FRAMES, surpassing or matching GRPO trained with twice as many gradient steps while adding only about 5 percent overhead per step from a single additional forward pass.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2026.
Builds on
23 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025An Empirical Study on Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning-Search Interleaved LLM Agents21 May
- 2025WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capability30 Apr
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learning12 Mar
Other references · 20
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
- 2025SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wildcited by 505
- 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillationcited by 285
- 2026Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipecited by 262
- 2025The Landscape of Agentic Reinforcement Learning for LLMs: A Surveycited by 195
- 2026A Survey of On-Policy Distillation for Large Language Modelscited by 148
- 2019Generalization in Generation: A closer look at Exposure Biascited by 123
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
- 2025Chain-of-Agents: End-to-End Agent Foundation Models via Multi-Agent Distillation and Agentic RLcited by 75
8 more
- 2025The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Executioncited by 73
- 2025MiroThinker: Pushing the Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Research Agents via Model, Context, and Interactive Scalingcited by 72
- 2026Unifying Group-Relative and Self-Distillation Policy Optimization via Sample Routingcited by 65
- 2026CRISP: Compressed Reasoning via Iterative Self-Policy Distillationcited by 49
- 2025CriticSearch: Fine-Grained Credit Assignment for Search Agents via a Retrospective Criticcited by 29
- 2025ReCode: Updating Code API Knowledge with Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2026OffSeeker: Online Reinforcement Learning Is Not All You Need for Deep Research Agentscited by 10
- 2025Mirage or Method? How Model-Task Alignment Induces Divergent RL Conclusionscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026SD-Search: On-Policy Hindsight Self-Distillation for Search-Augmented Reasoning
- 2026EviSD: Evidence-Conditioned Self-Distillation for Search-Augmented Agents
- 2026IGSD: Environment-Verified Hindsight Self-Distillation for Search Agents
- 2026StepOPSD: Step-Aware Online Preference Self-Distillation for Agent Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Chaining the Evidence: Robust Reinforcement Learning for Deep Search Agents with Citation-Aware Rubric Rewards
- 2026PR-OPD: Privileged Representation On-policy Self-Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Why Does Feedback-Augmented Self-Distillation Fail to Improve Retrieval-Interleaved Search Agents?
- 2026Search-E1: Self-Distillation Drives Self-Evolution in Search-Augmented Reasoning