mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Position: We Need Practical AI Alignment Methods to Mirror Human Reasoning

arXiv 2608.12372 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI systems are increasingly employed as decision aids, decision delegates, or autonomous decision-makers. This position paper argues that in many settings, particularly high-stakes decision-making, we need accurate cognitively-aligned AI systems that reason similarly to their users, and faithfully communicate their reasoning. We review evidence that cognitive alignment improves understandability and trustworthiness, and provide new survey data showing that many users find cognitive alignment "essential" when an AI's rationale for a judgment or action is important to them. We outline the gaps between existing alignment methods and what is needed to achieve cognitive alignment, and present a research agenda to address these gaps. We argue that cognitive misalignment represents a likely impediment to AI adoption in many envisioned applications, and that addressing it is important for creating AI systems on which users are both willing and justified to rely.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 123 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

Builds on

46 of 123 references.

References · 46

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  2. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
  3. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  6. 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
  7. 2024Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Modelscited by 308
  8. 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 249
  9. 2022Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matterscited by 222
  10. 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 135
  11. 2020Learning to Complement Humanscited by 124
  12. 2022Algorithms to estimate Shapley value feature attributionscited by 115
34 more
  1. 2024When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysiscited by 106
  2. 2016The Off-Switch Gamecited by 97
  3. 2019Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 57
  4. 2017A Voting-Based System for Ethical Decision Makingcited by 55
  5. 2021The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanationscited by 48
  6. 2024Rethinking Bradley-Terry Models in Preference-Based Reward Modeling: Foundations, Theory, and Alternativescited by 48
  7. 2020Adapting a Kidney Exchange Algorithm to Align with Human Valuescited by 36
  8. 2018Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Predictioncited by 35
  9. 2019Conservative Agency via Attainable Utility Preservationcited by 35
  10. 2023A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspectivecited by 33
  11. 2019Cognitive Model Priors for Predicting Human Decisionscited by 25
  12. 2022Interpretability, Then What? Editing Machine Learning Models to Reflect Human Knowledge and Valuescited by 25
  13. 2025From Tokens to Thoughts: How LLMs and Humans Trade Compression for Meaningcited by 25
  14. 2024Do LLMs Exhibit Human-Like Reasoning? Evaluating Theory of Mind in LLMs for Open-Ended Responsescited by 22
  15. 2025Large Language Models Do Not Simulate Human Psychologycited by 19
  16. 2024Capturing the Complexity of Human Strategic Decision-Making with Machine Learningcited by 14
  17. 2018A Computational Model of Commonsense Moral Decision Makingcited by 13
  18. 2025C3AI: Crafting and Evaluating Constitutions for Constitutional AIcited by 13
  19. 2026Legal Alignment for Safe and Ethical AIcited by 10
  20. 2025Can AI Model the Complexities of Human Moral Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Kidney Allocation Decisionscited by 9
  21. 2025Using Reinforcement Learning to Train Large Language Models to Explain Human Decisionscited by 9
  22. 2023Deploying a Robust Active Preference Elicitation Algorithm on MTurk: Experiment Design, Interface, and Evaluation for COVID-19 Patient Prioritizationcited by 8
  23. 2024On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methodscited by 7
  24. 2025Thinking Longer, Not Always Smarter: Evaluating LLM Capabilities in Hierarchical Legal Reasoningcited by 7
  25. 2022Interactive Machine Learning: A State of the Art Reviewcited by 6
  26. 2022Taking Advice from (Dis)Similar Machines: The Impact of Human-Machine Similarity on Machine-Assisted Decision-Makingcited by 6
  27. 2025Moral Change or Noise? On Problems of Aligning AI With Temporally Unstable Human Feedbackcited by 6
  28. 2025Standardizing Intelligence: Aligning Generative AI for Regulatory and Operational Compliancecited by 5
  29. 2024User-centric evaluation of explainability of AI with and for humans: a comprehensive empirical studycited by 4
  30. 2025Towards Cognitively-Faithful Decision-Making Models to Improve AI Alignmentcited by 3
  31. 2013Arguing for Decisions: A Qualitative Model of Decision Makingcited by 2
  32. 2024Deep Rating Elicitation for New Users in Collaborative Filteringcited by 2
  33. 2024STL: Still Tricky Logic (for System Validation, Even When Showing Your Work)cited by 2
  34. 2026Representational Similarity Alignment of Figurative Language in Humans and Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.