Deploying a Robust Active Preference Elicitation Algorithm on MTurk: Experiment Design, Interface, and Evaluation for COVID-19 Patient Prioritization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Preference elicitation leverages AI or optimization to learn stakeholder preferences in settings ranging from marketing to public policy. The online robust preference elicitation procedure of arXiv:2003.01899 has been shown in simulation to outperform various other elicitation procedures in terms of effectively learning individuals' true utilities. However, as with any simulation, the method makes a series of assumptions that cannot easily be verified to hold true beyond simulation. Thus, we propose to validate the robust method's performance using real users, focusing on the particular challenge of selecting policies for prioritizing COVID-19 patients for scarce hospital resources during the pandemic. To this end, we develop an online platform for preference elicitation where users report their preferences between alternatives over a moderate number of pairwise comparisons chosen by a particular elicitation procedure. We recruit 193 Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) workers to report their preferences and demonstrate that the robust method outperforms asking random queries by 21%, the next best performing method in the simulated results of arXiv:2003.01899, in terms of recommending policies with a higher utility.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2023.
Builds on
6 of 37 references.
References · 6
- 2020Adapting a Kidney Exchange Algorithm to Align with Human Valuescited by 36
- 2023Understanding Frontline Workers' and Unhoused Individuals' Perspectives on AI Used in Homeless Servicescited by 29
- 2019Machine Learning-powered Iterative Combinatorial Auctionscited by 10
- 2020Robust Active Preference Elicitationcited by 9
- 2020Indecision Modelingcited by 8
- 2018A Cost-Effective Framework for Preference Elicitation and Aggregationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025Can AI Model the Complexities of Human Moral Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Kidney Allocation Decisionscited by 9
- 2024On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methodscited by 7
- 2024On the Pros and Cons of Active Learning for Moral Preference Elicitationcited by 6
- 2025Towards Cognitively-Faithful Decision-Making Models to Improve AI Alignmentcited by 2
- 2025Toward AI Matching Policies in Homeless Services: A Qualitative Study with Policymakerscited by 0
- 2026Position: We Need Practical AI Alignment Methods to Mirror Human Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Preference Elicitation for Policy Optimization and Application to Aligning Heart Transplantation with Human Valuescited by 0
- 2026Preference Elicitation for Policy Optimization and Application to Aligning Heart Transplantation with Human Values29 Jul 2026
- 2026Position: We Need Practical AI Alignment Methods to Mirror Human Reasoning20 Jul 2026
- 2025Towards Cognitively-Faithful Decision-Making Models to Improve AI Alignment4 Sep 2025
- 2025Toward AI Matching Policies in Homeless Services: A Qualitative Study with Policymakers10 Aug 2025
- 2025Can AI Model the Complexities of Human Moral Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Kidney Allocation Decisions2 Mar 2025
- 2024On The Stability of Moral Preferences: A Problem with Computational Elicitation Methods5 Aug 2024
- 2024On the Pros and Cons of Active Learning for Moral Preference Elicitation26 Jul 2024