Multiwinner Approval Rules as Apportionment Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We establish a link between multiwinner elections and apportionment problems by showing how approval-based multiwinner election rules can be interpreted as methods of apportionment. We consider several multiwinner rules and observe that they induce apportionment methods that are well-established in the literature on proportional representation. For instance, we show that Proportional Approval Voting induces the D'Hondt method and that Monroe's rule induces the largest reminder method. We also consider properties of apportionment methods and exhibit multiwinner rules that induce apportionment methods satisfying these properties.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Fair Submodular Covercited by 6
- 2021DiRe Committee : Diversity and Representation Constraints in Multiwinner Electionscited by 3
- 2023Fairness in Streaming Submodular Maximization over a Matroid Constraintcited by 3
- 2023Fairness in Submodular Maximization over a Matroid Constraintcited by 2
- 2026Strengthening Full Justified Representation: Efficient Verification and Computationcited by 1
- 2026Strengthening Full Justified Representation: Efficient Verification and Computation11 Aug 2026
- 2024Fair Submodular Cover5 Jul 2024
- 2023Fairness in Submodular Maximization over a Matroid Constraint21 Dec 2023
- 2023Fairness in Streaming Submodular Maximization over a Matroid Constraint24 May 2023
- 2021DiRe Committee : Diversity and Representation Constraints in Multiwinner Elections15 Jul 2021