mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ASCon: A Direction-Aware Reciprocal Agent--Step Contextualization Model for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv 2608.10646 ↗First posted 11 Aug 2026cs.MAcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Failure attribution in LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) aims to answer who caused failures, when they occurred, and why by identifying responsible targets including faulty agents, erroneous steps, and failure modes. Existing methods have primarily focused on developing dedicated models for specific attribution targets, with limited attention to the evidential dependencies among them. Despite these attribution targets are different, they rely on common diagnostic evidence from MAS trajectories, including task constraints, agent roles, behavioral histories and inter-agent interactions. This commonality motivates us to develop a unified representation model that aggregates the trajectory evidence into individual agent and step representations, which can subsequently be adapted to different attribution targets. Accordingly, we propose ASCon, a direction-aware reciprocal Agent--Step Contextualization model for multiple failure attribution targets. ASCon introduces direction-aware graph attention to model execution context, masked step-to-agent attention to construct behavior-aware agent representations, and agent-conditioned step contextualization to incorporate agent context back into step representations. The resulting contextualized representations enable different attribution targets through lightweight target-specific heads. Experiments show that ASCon can improve faulty-agent detection by 5.83%+ in micro-accuracy, faulty-step detection by 10.63%+ in micro-accuracy, and failure-mode detection by 14.73%+ in Macro-F1. Meanwhile, it can also substantially enhance the LLM-based methods' attribution capabilities in out-of-domain scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2026.

Builds on

16 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 14

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026StepFinder: A Temporal Semantic Framework for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems2 Jun
  2. 2026VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems17 May
  3. 2026Seeing the Whole Elephant: A Benchmark for Failure Attribution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems24 Apr
  4. 2026Rethinking Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems: A Multi-Perspective Benchmark and Evaluation26 Mar
  5. 2026From Flat Logs to Causal Graphs: Hierarchical Failure Attribution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems27 Feb
  6. 2025XAgen: An Explainability Tool for Identifying and Correcting Failures in Multi-Agent Workflows19 Dec
  7. 2025DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems7 Dec
  8. 2025Aegis: Automated Error Generation and Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems17 Sep
  9. 2025Abduct, Act, Predict: Scaffolding Causal Inference for Automated Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems12 Sep
  10. 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?3 Sep
  11. 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems30 Apr
  12. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
2 more
  1. 2025Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems3 Mar
  2. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development16 Jul

Other references · 2

  1. 2025RAFFLES: Reasoning-based Attribution of Faults for LLM Systemscited by 21
  2. 2026Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Adaptive Influence Graphs for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2026Detect Before You Attribute: Cascade Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems
  3. 2026DCFA: Dual-view Causal-inspired Attribution for Failure Reasoning in LLM-based Multi-agent Systems
  4. 2026Can Failed Trajectories Reveal Where Agents Go Wrong? Agentic Failure Attribution Without Step-Level Labels
  5. 2026MASPrism: Lightweight Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems Using Prefill-Stage Signals
  6. 2026Error-Propagation Modeling for Failure Attribution in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
  7. 2026Beyond LLM-Based Reasoning: Lightweight GNNs for Agent Failure Attribution
  8. 2026FALAT: Tracing Failures in LLM Agent Trajectories via Dependency-Guided Search