StepFinder: A Temporal Semantic Framework for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit remarkable collaborative capabilities in complex multi-step tasks. However, these systems are highly sensitive to single-step execution errors that can propagate through agent interactions and lead to cascading failures. To understand the causes of failure and improve system reliability, failure attribution has been introduced as a task that aims to automatically identify the root cause step responsible for a failure. Existing failure attribution methods mainly rely on LLMs to reason over original execution trajectories, which not only incur high inference costs and latency, but also suffer from interference caused by redundant and noisy execution logs, causing LLMs to struggle in accurately identifying the true root cause step. To address this, we propose StepFinder, a lightweight failure attribution framework. We use LLMs solely during the feature construction phase to encode execution logs into temporal semantic sequences. Subsequently, a parameter-efficient combination of temporal modeling and attention modules is applied to capture the sequential evolution and cross-step dependencies of the trajectories. Finally, the step-level error score is refined through multi-scale differences and position bias, enabling precise root cause identification. Experimental results on the Who&When benchmark demonstrate that StepFinder outperforms LLM-based methods in step-level failure attribution while achieving substantially higher inference efficiency, reducing inference time by 79% compared with the fastest LLM-based method, with no text generation overhead. Our code is available at https://github.com/taiyu-zhu/StepFinder.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
26 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Where Did It All Go Wrong? A Hierarchical Look into Multi-Agent Error Attribution6 Oct
- 2025Who is Introducing the Failure? Automatically Attributing Failures of Multi-Agent Systems via Spectrum Analysis17 Sep
- 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?3 Sep
- 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization13 May
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
- 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development16 Jul
Other references · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
- 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 405
- 2023On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical Investigationcited by 308
- 2025Multi-agent Architecture Search via Agentic Supernetcited by 164
- 2025Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and Topologiescited by 106
- 2024On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agentscited by 92
8 more
- 2024Breaking Agents: Compromising Autonomous LLM Agents Through Malfunction Amplificationcited by 80
- 2023Embodied Multi-Modal Agent trained by an LLM from a Parallel TextWorldcited by 65
- 2024Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 45
- 2024Root Cause Analysis In Microservice Using Neural Granger Causal Discoverycited by 31
- 2025Single-agent or Multi-agent Systems? Why Not Both?cited by 28
- 2025RAFFLES: Reasoning-based Attribution of Faults for LLM Systemscited by 19
- 2025Automatic Failure Attribution and Critical Step Prediction Method for Multi-Agent Systems Based on Causal Inferencecited by 18
- 2025Assessing and Enhancing the Robustness of LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Through Chaos Engineeringcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Seeing the Whole Elephant: A Benchmark for Failure Attribution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Detect Before You Attribute: Cascade Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Rethinking Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems: A Multi-Perspective Benchmark and Evaluation
- 2026DeFA: Dependency-Guided Failure Attribution for LLM Agents
- 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026MASPrism: Lightweight Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems Using Prefill-Stage Signals
- 2026FALAT: Tracing Failures in LLM Agent Trajectories via Dependency-Guided Search