mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DoVer: Intervention-Driven Auto Debugging for LLM Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv 2512.06749 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2025cs.AI cs.SEcited by 23

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems are challenging to debug because failures often arise from long, branching interaction traces. The prevailing practice is to leverage LLMs for log-based failure localization, attributing errors to a specific agent and step. However, this paradigm has two key limitations: (i) log-only debugging lacks validation, producing untested hypotheses, and (ii) single-step or single-agent attribution is often ill-posed, as we find that multiple distinct interventions can independently repair the failed task. To address the first limitation, we introduce DoVer, an intervention-driven debugging framework, which augments hypothesis generation with active verification through targeted interventions (e.g., editing messages, altering plans). For the second limitation, rather than evaluating on attribution accuracy, we focus on measuring whether the system resolves the failure or makes quantifiable progress toward task success, reflecting a more outcome-oriented view of debugging. Within the Magnetic-One agent framework, on the datasets derived from GAIA and AssistantBench, DoVer flips 18-28% of failed trials into successes, achieves up to 16% milestone progress, and validates or refutes 30-60% of failure hypotheses. DoVer also performs effectively on a different dataset (GSMPlus) and agent framework (AG2), where it recovers 49% of failed trials. These results highlight intervention as a practical mechanism for improving reliability in agentic systems and open opportunities for more robust, scalable debugging methods for LLM-based multi-agent systems. Project website and code will be available at https://aka.ms/DoVer.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2025.

Builds on

25 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Where Did It All Go Wrong? A Hierarchical Look into Multi-Agent Error Attribution6 Oct
  2. 2025Who is Introducing the Failure? Automatically Attributing Failures of Multi-Agent Systems via Spectrum Analysis17 Sep
  3. 2025Abduct, Act, Predict: Scaffolding Causal Inference for Automated Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems12 Sep
  4. 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?3 Sep
  5. 2025Can Agents Fix Agent Issues?27 May
  6. 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization13 May
  7. 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems30 Apr
  8. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
  9. 2025Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems3 Mar
  10. 2025Evaluating Agent-based Program Repair at Google13 Jan

Other references · 15

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  4. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  5. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  6. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  7. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
  8. 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agentscited by 223
  9. 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Taskscited by 221
  10. 2024GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solverscited by 155
  11. 2024AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?cited by 155
  12. 2023MathChat: Converse to Tackle Challenging Math Problems with LLM Agentscited by 67
3 more
  1. 2025GraphTracer: Graph-Guided Failure Tracing in LLM Agents for Robust Multi-Turn Deep Searchcited by 22
  2. 2025Automatic Failure Attribution and Critical Step Prediction Method for Multi-Agent Systems Based on Causal Inferencecited by 18
  3. 2024Assessing and Verifying Task Utility in LLM-Powered Applicationscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 23.

23 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026From Failed Trajectories to Reliable LLM Agents: Diagnosing and Repairing Harness Flawscited by 21
  2. 2026AutoSaddler: Automatic Harness Optimization with Durable Updates from Agent Execution Tracescited by 9
  3. 2026Beyond Individual Intelligence: Surveying Collaboration, Failure Attribution, and Self-Evolution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 5
  4. 2026FinEvolveBench: A Benchmark for Self-Evolving Agents on Low-Repetition Tasks with Implicit Rewardscited by 3
  5. 2026MASRubric: Auditing Information Flow in Multi-Agent Systems with Failure-Distilled Pitfall Rubricscited by 2
  6. 2026Retrieval-Conditioned Topology Selection with Provable Budget Conservation for Multi-Agent Code Generationcited by 1
  7. 2026Insights Generator: Systematic Corpus-Level Trace Diagnostics for LLM Agentscited by 1
  8. 2026AgenticRepair: Multi-Faceted Program Context Engineering for Agentic Vulnerability Repaircited by 1
  9. 2026ASCon: A Direction-Aware Reciprocal Agent--Step Contextualization Model for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 1
  10. 2026AgentGrad: Intervention-guided Prompt Optimization for Multi Agent Systemscited by 1
  11. 2026Agents that Matter: Optimizing Multi-Agent LLMs via Removal-Based Attributioncited by 0
  12. 2026POIROT: Interrogating Agents for Failure Detection in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 0
11 more
  1. 2026Diagnosis-Driven Automatic Repair for Agentic Workflow via Symbolic Inferencecited by 0
  2. 2026Omni-Decision: Evidence-Ledger Planning for Omni-Modal Agentscited by 0
  3. 2026Localizing Emergent Failures in Agentic AI: Recovering Minimal Repair Families via Counterfactual Replaycited by 0
  4. 2026What if LLMs Ate Their Words: Causal History Effects in Multi-Turn Interactioncited by 0
  5. 2026Chronicle: Cut-Point Replay for Regression Testing of LLM Agentscited by 0
  6. 2026DENSE: Distilling Agent Trajectories into Evidence-Grounded Shortcut Trees for Self-Refinementcited by 0
  7. 2026ProCredit: From Outcome Rewards to Progress Credit in Agentic Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  8. 2026DAAF: From Failure Localization to Editable System Assets in LLM Agentscited by 0
  9. 2026The Right Lesson at the Right Step: Deriving Control Updates for Self-Evolving Agentscited by 0
  10. 2026Where MLLMs Fail and Why: Causal Task Decomposition for Capability Failure Diagnosiscited by 0
  11. 2026When Harnesses Lose the Signal: Causal Evaluation of Recovery in LLM Agentscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures
  3. 2026VerifyMAS: Hypothesis Verification for Failure Attribution in LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  4. 2026AgentDebugX: An Open-Source Toolkit for Failure Observability, Attribution, and Recovery in LLM Agents
  5. 2026Seeing the Whole Elephant: A Benchmark for Failure Attribution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
  6. 2026Who Broke the System? Failure Localization in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
  7. 2026Towards Self-Improving Error Diagnosis in Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2026Knowledge-Based Zero-Replay Debugging of Multi-Agent LLM Traces