mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MASPrism: Lightweight Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems Using Prefill-Stage Signals

arXiv 2605.07509 ↗First posted 8 May 2026cs.SEcited by 5

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Failure attribution in LLM-based multi-agent systems aims to identify the steps that contribute to a failed execution. This task remains difficult because a single execution can contain many agent actions and tool calls, failure evidence can appear many steps after the original mistake, and existing methods often rely on costly agent workflows, replay, or training on synthetic failure logs. To address these challenges, we propose MASPrism, a lightweight framework that performs failure attribution using prefill-stage signals from a small language model (SLM). MASPrism first extracts token-level negative log-likelihood and attention weights during a prefill pass to identify symptom-like steps and earlier candidate sources, without decoding. It then reconstructs a focused diagnostic prompt and performs a second prefill pass to rank failure-source candidates. Using Qwen3-0.6B as the SLM, MASPrism achieves the best performance on three of the four evaluated subsets across Who&When and TRAIL, improving Top-1 accuracy on Who&When-HC by 33.41% over the best baseline. On TRAIL, MASPrism outperforms strong proprietary LLMs, including Gemini-2.5-Pro, with up to 89.50% relative improvement. MASPrism processes each trace in 2.66 seconds on average, achieving a 6.69× speedup over the single-pass prompting baseline, with zero output tokens. These results show that MASPrism provides an effective and practical framework for failure attribution in long multi-agent execution logs.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 25 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2026.

Builds on

25 of 51 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026From Flat Logs to Causal Graphs: Hierarchical Failure Attribution for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems27 Feb
  2. 2026MAS-FIRE: Fault Injection and Reliability Evaluation for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems23 Feb
  3. 2025Where Did It All Go Wrong? A Hierarchical Look into Multi-Agent Error Attribution6 Oct
  4. 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?3 Sep
  5. 2025Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories23 Jun
  6. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?17 Mar
  7. 2024RepairAgent: An Autonomous, LLM-Based Agent for Program Repair25 Mar
  8. 2024AgentLens: Visual Analysis for Agent Behaviors in LLM-based Autonomous Systems14 Feb

Other references · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  4. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  5. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  6. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  7. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  8. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  9. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  10. 2023Splitwise: Efficient generative LLM inference using phase splittingcited by 536
  11. 2024Taming Throughput-Latency Tradeoff in LLM Inference with Sarathi-Servecited by 507
  12. 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Taskscited by 221
5 more
  1. 2023Keep the Conversation Going: Fixing 162 out of 337 bugs for 0.42 each using ChatGPTcited by 125
  2. 2023Large Language Models for Test-Free Fault Localizationcited by 67
  3. 2023A Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of LLM-Based Explainable Fault Localizationcited by 50
  4. 2026Prefill-as-a-Service: KVCache of Next-Generation Models Could Go Cross-Datacentercited by 11
  5. 2025OverFill: Two-Stage Models for Efficient Language Model Decodingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026StepFinder: A Temporal Semantic Framework for Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2026Rethinking Failure Attribution in Multi-Agent Systems: A Multi-Perspective Benchmark and Evaluation
  3. 2026Seeing the Whole Elephant: A Benchmark for Failure Attribution in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems
  4. 2025Which Agent Causes Task Failures and When? On Automated Failure Attribution of LLM Multi-Agent Systems
  5. 2025Who is Introducing the Failure? Automatically Attributing Failures of Multi-Agent Systems via Spectrum Analysis
  6. 2026Tracing Agentic Failure from the Flow of Success
  7. 2026Detect Before You Attribute: Cascade Failure Attribution for Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2026DeFA: Dependency-Guided Failure Attribution for LLM Agents