mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

XAgen: An Explainability Tool for Identifying and Correcting Failures in Multi-Agent Workflows

arXiv 2512.17896 ↗First posted 19 Dec 2025cs.HCcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

As multi-agent systems powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in real-world workflows, users with diverse technical backgrounds are now building and refining their own agentic processes. However, these systems can fail in opaque ways, making it difficult for users to observe, understand, and correct errors. We conducted formative interviews with 12 practitioners to identify mismatches between existing debugging tools and users' needs. Based on these insights, we designed XAgen, an explainability tool that supports users with varying AI expertise through three core capabilities: log visualization for glanceable workflow understanding, human-in-the-loop feedback to capture expert judgment, and automatic error detection via an LLM-as-a-judge. In a user study with 8 participants, XAgen helped users locate failures more easily, attribute to specific agents or steps, and iteratively improve configurations. Our findings surface human-centered design guidelines for explainable agentic AI development and highlight opportunities for more context-aware interactive debugging.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2025.

Builds on

15 of 43 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Interactive Debugging and Steering of Multi-Agent AI Systems3 Mar

Other references · 14

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  4. 2024WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 424
  5. 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Taskscited by 221
  6. 2021Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needscited by 64
  7. 2021The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanationscited by 48
  8. 2023CoQuest: Exploring Research Question Co-Creation with an LLM-based Agentcited by 34
  9. 2023The HaLLMark Effect: Supporting Provenance and Transparent Use of Large Language Models in Writing with Interactive Visualizationcited by 23
  10. 2017Simple rules for complex decisionscited by 14
  11. 2025FontCraft: Multimodal Font Design Using Interactive Bayesian Optimizationcited by 7
  12. 2024ChainBuddy: An AI Agent System for Generating LLM Pipelinescited by 6
2 more
  1. 2025Less or More: Towards Glanceable Explanations for LLM Recommendations Using Ultra-Small Devicescited by 3
  2. 2025ImprovMate: Multimodal AI Assistant for Improv Actor Trainingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AgentCompass: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Agentic Workflows in Production
  2. 2026XAI for Coding Agent Failures: Transforming Raw Execution Traces into Actionable Insights
  3. 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization
  4. 2025Where LLM Agents Fail and How They can Learn From Failures
  5. 2025Demystifying the Lifecycle of Failures in Platform-Orchestrated Agentic Workflows
  6. 2026AgentEval: DAG-Structured Step-Level Evaluation for Agentic Workflows with Error Propagation Tracking
  7. 2026XAgent: eXecution-guided Agentic AI for Effective Localization and Resolution of GitHub Issues
  8. 2025FlowAgent: Achieving Compliance and Flexibility for Workflow Agents