Action- and Language-Conditioned Video Assessment for Embodied Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-based embodied agents executing multi-step natural language instructions require feedback mechanisms that assess task progress over complete trajectories. Conventional approaches based on final-frame matching or continuous embedding similarity may overlook intermediate transitions that are necessary for determining whether an instruction has been completed. We propose ALVA (Action- and Language-Conditioned Video Assessment), a trajectory evaluator that conditions its assessment on visual observations, the executed action sequence, and the natural language instruction. The method uses a pre-trained vision-language model (VLM) in two stages: it first summarizes frame-to-frame visual transitions conditioned on the executed actions and then assesses the generated summary with respect to the instruction to produce a discrete trajectory-level progress score. In simulated 3D household environments, ALVA exhibits a conservative assessment pattern with near-zero false-positive rates. When used as terminal feedback for closed-loop policy optimization, it provides more effective feedback than the evaluated static image and embedding-based visual baselines and reduces the performance gap to a ground-truth oracle. These results support action- and language-conditioned video assessment as an interpretable feedback mechanism for the evaluated simulated embodied-control tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.
Builds on
41 of 51 references.
References · 41
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
- 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
- 2017AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AIcited by 850
- 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 834
29 more
- 2019ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Taskscited by 773
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
- 2021NExT-QA:Next Phase of Question-Answering to Explaining Temporal Actionscited by 735
- 2022R3M: A Universal Visual Representation for Robot Manipulationcited by 678
- 2021CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Taskscited by 564
- 2023Eureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Modelscited by 542
- 2017Rethinking Spatiotemporal Feature Learning: Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Video Classificationcited by 521
- 2023Language to Rewards for Robotic Skill Synthesiscited by 307
- 2018Reinforced Cross-Modal Matching and Self-Supervised Imitation Learning for Vision-Language Navigationcited by 304
- 2023Reward Design with Language Modelscited by 257
- 2022Visual Prompting via Image Inpaintingcited by 248
- 2023What does CLIP know about a red circle? Visual prompt engineering for VLMscited by 215
- 2023RoboGen: Towards Unleashing Infinite Data for Automated Robot Learning via Generative Simulationcited by 206
- 2023LIV: Language-Image Representations and Rewards for Robotic Controlcited by 180
- 2017Interactive Learning from Policy-Dependent Human Feedbackcited by 155
- 2023Vision-Language Models are Zero-Shot Reward Models for Reinforcement Learningcited by 155
- 2019A Survey of Reinforcement Learning Informed by Natural Languagecited by 154
- 2024RL-VLM-F: Reinforcement Learning from Vision Language Foundation Model Feedbackcited by 147
- 2023Vision-Language Models as Success Detectorscited by 138
- 2023RoboCLIP: One Demonstration is Enough to Learn Robot Policiescited by 128
- 2021Learning Language-Conditioned Robot Behavior from Offline Data and Crowd-Sourced Annotationcited by 117
- 2023Bootstrap Your Own Skills: Learning to Solve New Tasks with Large Language Model Guidancecited by 85
- 2018Learning to Understand Goal Specifications by Modelling Rewardcited by 80
- 2022Can Foundation Models Perform Zero-Shot Task Specification For Robot Manipulation?cited by 70
- 2019From Language to Goals: Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Instruction Followingcited by 67
- 2022From Representation to Reasoning: Towards both Evidence and Commonsense Reasoning for Video Question-Answeringcited by 51
- 2021Learning Reward Functions from Scale Feedbackcited by 24
- 2024MECD: Unlocking Multi-Event Causal Discovery in Video Reasoningcited by 23
- 2023Rating-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Qwen-RobotWorld Technical Report: Unifying Embodied World Modeling through Language-Conditioned Video Generation
- 2026From Human Videos to Robot Manipulation: A Survey on Scalable Vision-Language-Action Learning with Human-Centric Data
- 2026Vision-Language-Action in Robotics: A Survey of Datasets, Benchmarks, and Data Engines
- 2025UrbanVideo-Bench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Embodied Intelligence with Video Data in Urban Spaces
- 2025EWMBench: Evaluating Scene, Motion, and Semantic Quality in Embodied World Models
- 2026How Foundational Skills Influence VLM-based Embodied Agents:A Native Perspective
- 2024WorldSimBench: Towards Video Generation Models as World Simulators
- 2026Native Video-Action Pretraining for Generalizable Robot Control