mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

UAV3DCrop: Benchmarking 3D Reconstruction in Repeated Multi-Angle UAV Crop Surveys

arXiv 2608.06404 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate 3D crop monitoring underpins data-driven precision agriculture by enabling field-scale analysis of plant structure, growth dynamics, and management response. Modern 3D reconstruction methods perform strongly on generic benchmarks, but rendered appearance may not translate into metrically and agronomically useful geometry in crop fields. We introduce UAV3DCrop, a public benchmark of repeated multi-angle unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) crop surveys. It contains 88,830 RGB images at 5280 × 3956 pixels, with a ground sampling distance of 3.6-5.8 mm, from 91 scenes spanning corn, soybean, wheat, and oat. Track A evaluates seven scene-optimized methods -- Neural Radiance Field (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) variants -- on held-out views, photogrammetry-referenced depth, and canopy-height recovery. Track B tests four pretrained feed-forward models on zero-shot camera-pose and geometry estimation. The scene-optimized methods rank differently across the three targets: Splatfacto-big leads appearance, whereas Scaffold-GS leads depth and is statistically tied with Splatfacto for canopy height. Among feed-forward models, MapAnything leads on seven of the eight metrics, while the remaining models vary more across crops and fail severely on absolute scale in a way that alignment conceals. Repeated acquisitions reveal further sensitivities that differ by output type and by model, associated with position within the acquisition sequence and with tie-point multiplicity. Current 3D reconstruction methods are therefore not yet interchangeable for agronomic use: no single method wins on appearance, geometry, and canopy height at once, and only one of four feed-forward models recovers usable metric scale. The dataset is publicly available at https://link-dev.github.io/UAV3DCrop/

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.

Builds on

18 of 43 references.

References · 18

  1. 20233D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Renderingcited by 6,141
  2. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,698
  3. 2021Mip-NeRF 360: Unbounded Anti-Aliased Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 2,013
  4. 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,526
  5. 2025VGGT: Visual Geometry Grounded Transformercited by 1,475
  6. 2024Grounding Image Matching in 3D with MASt3Rcited by 960
  7. 2023Scaffold-GS: Structured 3D Gaussians for View-Adaptive Renderingcited by 684
  8. 2023Mip-Splatting: Alias-free 3D Gaussian Splattingcited by 661
  9. 2023Nerfstudio: A Modular Framework for Neural Radiance Field Developmentcited by 596
  10. 2019BlendedMVS: A Large-scale Dataset for Generalized Multi-view Stereo Networkscited by 487
  11. 2025MapAnything: Universal Feed-Forward Metric 3D Reconstructioncited by 295
  12. 2025π3: Permutation-Equivariant Visual Geometry Learningcited by 292
6 more
  1. 2024CityGaussian: Real-time High-quality Large-Scale Scene Rendering with Gaussianscited by 190
  2. 2024Recent Advances in 3D Gaussian Splattingcited by 130
  3. 2021AA-RMVSNet: Adaptive Aggregation Recurrent Multi-view Stereo Networkcited by 71
  4. 2023PAg-NeRF: Towards fast and efficient end-to-end panoptic 3D representations for agricultural roboticscited by 16
  5. 2025Wheat3DGS: In-field 3D Reconstruction, Instance Segmentation and Phenotyping of Wheat Heads with Gaussian Splattingcited by 13
  6. 2025Tomato Multi-Angle Multi-Pose Dataset for Fine-Grained Phenotypingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.