mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CENDRe: Concept Extraction with Natural Domain Representations

arXiv 2607.29621 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are widely used for time-series classification, but their deployment in critical domains requires understanding the temporal and spectral patterns that drive their predictions. Concept extraction (CE) methods identify such patterns by analyzing representations within the models' latent space. However, existing time-series CE methods have three limitations: they operate only in the time domain and overlook frequency features, predefine the number of concepts, and produce localizations misaligned with the regions the model uses. We address these limitations by proposing CENDRe, a concept extraction method for CNNs. It first discovers concepts by clustering per-timestep latent representations in two stages, where silhouette-guided aggregation selects the number of concepts automatically. Then, it localizes each concept through gradients of a presence score that contrasts the latent representations with their prototypes, producing masks that concentrate on the regions driving the concept. These gradients, propagated through a differentiable invertible mapping of the input such as a Fourier transform, yield localizations for the same concepts in the frequency domain. Finally, each concept receives a relevance score that quantifies its contribution to each class. On synthetic benchmarks, CENDRe achieves representation correctness comparable to state-of-the-art CE methods and significantly higher importance correctness. On real bearing-fault data, CENDRe extracts the frequency bands driving the model's predictions, located in regions commonly inspected for fault diagnosis, producing evidence to assess the model that time-domain CE methods cannot.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

20 of 51 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  3. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  4. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  5. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
  6. 2019InceptionTime: Finding AlexNet for Time Series Classificationcited by 387
  7. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  8. 2020Ground Truth Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations with CLEVR-XAIcited by 126
  9. 2021Deformable ProtoPNet: An Interpretable Image Classifier Using Deformable Prototypescited by 120
  10. 2023Concept-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Surveycited by 98
  11. 2023Explainable AI for Time Series via Virtual Inspection Layerscited by 23
  12. 2022ECLAD: Extracting Concepts with Local Aggregated Descriptorscited by 15
8 more
  1. 2022Towards Prototype-Based Self-Explainable Graph Neural Networkcited by 14
  2. 2021PACE: Posthoc Architecture-Agnostic Concept Extractor for Explaining CNNscited by 12
  3. 2023Concept-based explainability for an EEG transformer modelcited by 8
  4. 2024Time is Not Enough: Time-Frequency based Explanation for Time-Series Black-Box Modelscited by 6
  5. 2023Scale-Preserving Automatic Concept Extraction (SPACE)cited by 2
  6. 2023Explaining Deep Neural Networks for Bearing Fault Detection with Vibration Conceptscited by 2
  7. 2025Concept Extraction for Time Series with ECLAD-tscited by 2
  8. 2025From Confusion to Clarity: ProtoScore -- A Framework for Evaluating Prototype-Based XAIcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.