Scale-Preserving Automatic Concept Extraction (SPACE)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have become a common choice for industrial quality control, as well as other critical applications in the Industry 4.0. When these CNNs behave in ways unexpected to human users or developers, severe consequences can arise, such as economic losses or an increased risk to human life. Concept extraction techniques can be applied to increase the reliability and transparency of CNNs through generating global explanations for trained neural network models. The decisive features of image datasets in quality control often depend on the feature's scale; for example, the size of a hole or an edge. However, existing concept extraction methods do not correctly represent scale, which leads to problems interpreting these models as we show herein. To address this issue, we introduce the Scale-Preserving Automatic Concept Extraction (SPACE) algorithm, as a state-of-the-art alternative concept extraction technique for CNNs, focused on industrial applications. SPACE is specifically designed to overcome the aforementioned problems by avoiding scale changes throughout the concept extraction process. SPACE proposes an approach based on square slices of input images, which are selected and then tiled before being clustered into concepts. Our method provides explanations of the models' decision-making process in the form of human-understandable concepts. We evaluate SPACE on three image classification datasets in the context of industrial quality control. Through experimental results, we illustrate how SPACE outperforms other methods and provides actionable insights on the decision mechanisms of CNNs. Finally, code for the implementation of SPACE is provided.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2023.
Builds on
21 of 37 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
- 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
- 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
- 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 227
- 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
9 more
- 2019Explaining Classifiers with Causal Concept Effect (CaCE)cited by 135
- 2019XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regionscited by 116
- 2016Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?cited by 100
- 2018Interpreting CNNs via Decision Treescited by 89
- 2014Scale-Invariant Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2021A Peek Into the Reasoning of Neural Networks: Interpreting with Structural Visual Conceptscited by 33
- 2016Learning scale-variant and scale-invariant features for deep image classificationcited by 20
- 2019Enhancing Decision Tree based Interpretation of Deep Neural Networks through L1-Orthogonal Regularizationcited by 9
- 2020Distilling a Deep Neural Network into a Takagi-Sugeno-Kang Fuzzy Inference Systemcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.