mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PACE: Posthoc Architecture-Agnostic Concept Extractor for Explaining CNNs

arXiv 2108.13828 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2021cs.CV cs.AIcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep CNNs, though have achieved the state of the art performance in image classification tasks, remain a black-box to a human using them. There is a growing interest in explaining the working of these deep models to improve their trustworthiness. In this paper, we introduce a Posthoc Architecture-agnostic Concept Extractor (PACE) that automatically extracts smaller sub-regions of the image called concepts relevant to the black-box prediction. PACE tightly integrates the faithfulness of the explanatory framework to the black-box model. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that extracts class-specific discriminative concepts in a posthoc manner automatically. The PACE framework is used to generate explanations for two different CNN architectures trained for classifying the AWA2 and Imagenet-Birds datasets. Extensive human subject experiments are conducted to validate the human interpretability and consistency of the explanations extracted by PACE. The results from these experiments suggest that over 72% of the concepts extracted by PACE are human interpretable.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2021.

Builds on

26 of 37 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  7. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  8. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  9. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  10. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  11. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  12. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
14 more
  1. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  2. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  3. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  4. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
  5. 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
  6. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  7. 2019Understanding Deep Networks via Extremal Perturbations and Smooth Maskscited by 257
  8. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  9. 2017Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains Its Predictionscited by 234
  10. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
  11. 2016Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networkscited by 181
  12. 2019Interpretable Image Recognition with Hierarchical Prototypescited by 64
  13. 2017The Doctor Just Won't Accept That!cited by 21
  14. 2020MAIRE -- A Model-Agnostic Interpretable Rule Extraction Procedure for Explaining Classifierscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

12 papers.