mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inverse RL Helps Align AI by Imitating Humans

arXiv 2607.24900 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Language model alignment aims to make model behavior reliably reflect desirable properties such as helpfulness, safety, and instruction following. Current approaches typically use supervised fine-tuning on demonstrations or reinforcement learning with rewards derived from verifiers or human feedback. These paradigms leave an important question underexplored: can demonstrations alone yield an implicit reward that can be inspected, reused, and optimized on-policy to align AI? Motivated by inverse reinforcement learning, we introduce Projected Alignment Reward Estimated from Demonstrations (PARED). PARED recovers the implicit reward underlying expert demonstrations as an explicit function over a small set of response-level features, learned by a lightweight discriminator that separates demonstrations from the policy's own samples in this feature space. Unlike a standard reward model, PARED requires no task-specific preference annotations: demonstrations provide the task-specific supervision, which can be augmented with AI feedback as additional dimensions of supervision. Through experiments involving inference-time reranking and adversarial on-policy RL, we show that the recovered reward improves a base policy without a supervised loss and yields further gains when optimized after standard supervised fine-tuning. Additionally, we demonstrate that PARED can be used for contextual alignment, in which a single policy can be tailored to the preferences of different audiences.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 34 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2026.

Builds on

34 of 41 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Insights from the Inverse: Reconstructing LLM Training Goals Through Inverse Reinforcement Learning16 Oct
  2. 2024Q-Probe: A Lightweight Approach to Reward Maximization for Language Models22 Feb
  3. 2023Rewarded soups: towards Pareto-optimal alignment by interpolating weights fine-tuned on diverse rewards7 Jun
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  5. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization19 Oct
  6. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  7. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback17 Dec
  8. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 26

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  7. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  8. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  9. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  10. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  11. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
  12. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
14 more
  1. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
  2. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  3. 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
  4. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
  5. 2016Guided Cost Learning: Deep Inverse Optimal Control via Policy Optimizationcited by 400
  6. 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 171
  7. 2024Personalized Language Modeling from Personalized Human Feedbackcited by 124
  8. 2024Controllable Preference Optimization: Toward Controllable Multi-Objective Alignmentcited by 105
  9. 2024PAL: Pluralistic Alignment Framework for Learning from Heterogeneous Preferencescited by 53
  10. 2024Value Augmented Sampling for Language Model Alignment and Personalizationcited by 49
  11. 2025Language Model Personalization via Reward Factorizationcited by 27
  12. 2024Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
  13. 2025Mining Intrinsic Rewards from LLM Hidden States for Efficient Best-of-N Samplingcited by 9
  14. 2026Right in the Right Way: LM Training with Verifiable Rewards and Human Demonstrationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Inverse-RLignment: Large Language Model Alignment from Demonstrations through Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2024Solving the Inverse Alignment Problem for Efficient RLHF
  3. 2025Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities
  4. 2024Rethinking Inverse Reinforcement Learning: from Data Alignment to Task Alignment
  5. 2024Inverse-Q*: Token Level Reinforcement Learning for Aligning Large Language Models Without Preference Data
  6. 2024Supervised Fine-Tuning as Inverse Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025From Demonstrations to Rewards: Alignment Without Explicit Human Preferences
  8. 2025Learning from Failures: Understanding LLM Alignment through Failure-Aware Inverse RL