Overlaying Governance: A Compositional Authorization Framework for Delegation and Scope in Agentic AI
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI systems evolve from passive models into autonomous active agents capable of initiating actions, collaborating, and delegating tasks, the traditional boundaries of software systems blur. Traditional authorization and delegation frameworks, built around fixed principals, explicit requests, and static scopes, are insufficient to govern agentic systems. Agentic AI demands richer authorization semantics: agents must inherit and delegate permissions, act under time-limited authority, and coordinate through shared protocols. Existing Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems fail to fully capture this notion of agency, lacking mechanisms for recursive delegation, contextual boundaries, and dynamic scoping as executable governance primitives. Unlike access delegation standards such as OAuth 2.0, we treat delegation as a contractual term rather than merely a static token-based consent credential. This paper proposes a compositional governance framework that introduces primitives indispensable for agentic AI. We define types of delegation and their permissions and accountability implications, and we introduce a notion of resource scope attenuation to bound agentic access envelopes. These concepts are expressed as general relational definitions that can be composed into existing authorization domains (e.g., financial systems). To operationalize this composition, we define a compositional operator that overlays new agentic semantics, such as recursive delegation chains, onto existing relational policies without rewriting them. We substantiate this framework through formal proofs and empirical evaluation, showing that it provides a formal yet practical foundation for accountable authorization in agentic AI systems.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 8 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 49 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Identity Management for Agentic AI: The new frontier of authorization, authentication, and security for an AI agent world29 Oct
- 2025MI9: An Integrated Runtime Governance Framework for Agentic AI5 Aug
- 2025LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles29 May
- 2025A Novel Zero-Trust Identity Framework for Agentic AI: Decentralized Authentication and Fine-Grained Access Control25 May
- 2025SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems27 Apr
Other references · 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Authorization Propagation in Multi-Agent AI Systems: Identity Governance as Infrastructure
- 2025Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agents
- 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
- 2026Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems
- 2026Delegation Without Trust: An Empirical Gap Analysis of Identity, Authorization, and Runtime Governance in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- 2026CAPMAS: Capability-Based Delegation of Privileges in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026SARC: A Governance-by-Architecture Framework for Agentic AI Systems
- 2026Observability for Delegated Execution in Agentic AI Systems