Authenticated Workflows: A Systems Approach to Protecting Agentic AI
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic AI systems automate enterprise workflows but existing defenses--guardrails, semantic filters--are probabilistic and routinely bypassed. We introduce authenticated workflows, the first complete trust layer for enterprise agentic AI. Security reduces to protecting four fundamental boundaries: prompts, tools, data, and context. We enforce intent (operations satisfy organizational policies) and integrity (operations are cryptographically authentic) at every boundary crossing, combining cryptographic elimination of attack classes with runtime policy enforcement. This delivers deterministic security--operations either carry valid cryptographic proof or are rejected. We introduce MAPL, an AI-native policy language that expresses agentic constraints dynamically as agents evolve and invocation context changes, scaling as O(log M + N) policies versus O(M x N) rules through hierarchical composition with cryptographic attestations for workflow dependencies. We prove practicality through a universal security runtime integrating nine leading frameworks (MCP, A2A, OpenAI, Claude, LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen, LlamaIndex, Haystack) through thin adapters requiring zero protocol modifications. Formal proofs establish completeness and soundness. Empirical validation shows 100% recall with zero false positives across 174 test cases, protection against 9 of 10 OWASP Top 10 risks, and complete mitigation of two high impact production CVEs.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.
Builds on
14 of 39 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2025A Survey on Agentic Security: Applications, Threats and Defenses7 Oct
- 2025From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows29 Jun
- 2023Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated Sandbox25 Sep
Other references · 11
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
- 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
- 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 608
- 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 568
- 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 328
- 2024AI Agents Under Threat: A Survey of Key Security Challenges and Future Pathwayscited by 122
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systemscited by 6
- 2026AI Identity: Standards, Gaps, and Research Directions for AI Agentscited by 5
- 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluationcited by 5
- 2026The Importance of Out-of-Band Metadata for Safe Autonomous Agents: The Redpanda Agentic Data Planecited by 1
- 2026Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems16 Aug 2026
- 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation9 Jun 2026
- 2026The Importance of Out-of-Band Metadata for Safe Autonomous Agents: The Redpanda Agentic Data Plane27 May 2026
- 2026AI Identity: Standards, Gaps, and Research Directions for AI Agents25 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026AgentFlow: A Flow-Centric Policy Language and Framework for Securing LLM Agent Systems
- 2025Safe, Untrusted, "Proof-Carrying" AI Agents: toward the agentic lakehouse
- 2026AgenticCyOps: Securing Multi-Agentic AI Integration in Enterprise Cyber Operations
- 2026Towards Agentic Cloud Engineering: Graph and Loop Engineering with a Zero-Trust Agent Harness
- 2025A Survey on Agent Workflow -- Status and Future
- 2026From Privacy to Workflow Integrity: Communication-Graph Metadata in Autonomous Agent Interoperability
- 2026Composing Verifiable Conceptual Models via Building Blocks: Towards Design-Time Verification of Agentic AI Workflows
- 2026Mnemosyne: Agentic Transaction Processing for Validating and Repairing AI-generated Workflows