GLID: Gated Local Intrinsic Dimension Repairs the Blind Spots of Face-Forgery Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuned foundation-model detectors dominate face-forgery benchmarks, yet they stay blind to generator families absent from training. We present GLID, a detector that repairs this blind spot with geometry instead of data. GLID treats the patch tokens of a single image as a sample from a manifold and estimates their local intrinsic dimension (LID) at several depths of a frozen vision transformer. This 12-dimensional, training-free signal enters a fine-tuned detector through a confidence gate whose strength is calibrated purely in-distribution. On a 16-axis cross-generator benchmark, GLID reaches 0.805 mean AUC, first among retrained state-of-the-art baselines and never significantly behind the strongest of them on any axis. It lifts the generation axes by +0.084 AUC while moving reenactment by only -0.005. Two empirical laws explain the design. First, forged faces bend the token manifold at family-specific depths: GAN artifacts peak at the last layer, diffusion artifacts peak mid-network, and the pattern survives four backbones, three dimension estimators, and non-face imagery. Second, fine-tuning absorbs auxiliary gains exactly where training data covers: injecting 1% target-family images erases a +0.100 gain, so geometric signals matter precisely where data is unavailable. The deterministic signal also cuts the cross-seed spread of accuracy 5.5x. Code, preregistered analysis gates, and per-image scores accompany the paper.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2026.
Builds on
66 of 71 references.
References · 66
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
38 more
- 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
- 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2020First Order Motion Model for Image Animationcited by 704
- 2020A Lip Sync Expert Is All You Need for Speech to Lip Generation In The Wildcited by 672
- 2019Celeb-DF: A Large-scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensicscited by 575
- 2020Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-aware Cluescited by 523
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
- 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 470
- 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 390
- 2022SadTalker: Learning Realistic 3D Motion Coefficients for Stylized Audio-Driven Single Image Talking Face Animationcited by 382
- 2023EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesiscited by 381
- 2022Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Imagescited by 338
- 2021The Intrinsic Dimension of Images and Its Impact on Learningcited by 315
- 2020Lips Don't Lie: A Generalisable and Robust Approach to Face Forgery Detectioncited by 287
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 282
- 2019Intrinsic dimension of data representations in deep neural networkscited by 282
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 273
- 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 267
- 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 255
- 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 250
- 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
- 2021SimSwap: An Efficient Framework For High Fidelity Face Swappingcited by 243
- 2022Thin-Plate Spline Motion Model for Image Animationcited by 210
- 2021WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detectioncited by 209
- 2021General Facial Representation Learning in a Visual-Linguistic Mannercited by 195
- 2019RetinaFace: Single-stage Dense Face Localisation in the Wildcited by 165
- 2021Exploring Temporal Coherence for More General Video Face Forgery Detectioncited by 159
- 2022Leveraging Real Talking Faces via Self-Supervision for Robust Forgery Detectioncited by 130
- 2024DF40: Toward Next-Generation Deepfake Detectioncited by 129
- 2024AEROBLADE: Training-Free Detection of Latent Diffusion Images Using Autoencoder Reconstruction Errorcited by 125
- 2023Intrinsic Dimension Estimation for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 112
- 2024Orthogonal Subspace Decomposition for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 105
- 2024Leveraging Representations from Intermediate Encoder-blocks for Synthetic Image Detectioncited by 89
- 2021Torch.manual_seed(3407) is all you need: On the influence of random seeds in deep learning architectures for computer visioncited by 81
- 2023BlendFace: Re-designing Identity Encoders for Face-Swappingcited by 66
50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.