mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Differentiable Unbiased Online Learning to Rank

arXiv 1809.08415 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2018cs.IRcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Online Learning to Rank (OLTR) methods optimize rankers based on user interactions. State-of-the-art OLTR methods are built specifically for linear models. Their approaches do not extend well to non-linear models such as neural networks. We introduce an entirely novel approach to OLTR that constructs a weighted differentiable pairwise loss after each interaction: Pairwise Differentiable Gradient Descent (PDGD). PDGD breaks away from the traditional approach that relies on interleaving or multileaving and extensive sampling of models to estimate gradients. Instead, its gradient is based on inferring preferences between document pairs from user clicks and can optimize any differentiable model. We prove that the gradient of PDGD is unbiased w.r.t. user document pair preferences. Our experiments on the largest publicly available Learning to Rank (LTR) datasets show considerable and significant improvements under all levels of interaction noise. PDGD outperforms existing OLTR methods both in terms of learning speed as well as final convergence. Furthermore, unlike previous OLTR methods, PDGD also allows for non-linear models to be optimized effectively. Our results show that using a neural network leads to even better performance at convergence than a linear model. In summary, PDGD is an efficient and unbiased OLTR approach that provides a better user experience than previously possible.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Doubly-Robust Estimation for Correcting Position-Bias in Click Feedback for Unbiased Learning to Rankcited by 17
  2. 2021Robust Generalization and Safe Query-Specialization in Counterfactual Learning to Rankcited by 6
  3. 2021PairRank: Online Pairwise Learning to Rank by Divide-and-Conquercited by 6
  4. 2021ULTRA: An Unbiased Learning To Rank Algorithm Toolboxcited by 6
  5. 2023Adversarial Attacks on Online Learning to Rank with Stochastic Click Modelscited by 6
  6. 2024How to Forget Clients in Federated Online Learning to Rank?cited by 4
  7. 2022Do Lessons from Metric Learning Generalize to Image-Caption Retrieval?cited by 3
  8. 2023The Role of Relevance in Fair Rankingcited by 3
  9. 2023Inference-time Stochastic Ranking with Risk Controlcited by 3
  10. 2025Unlearning for Federated Online Learning to Rank: A Reproducibility Studycited by 3
  11. 2024BayesCNS: A Unified Bayesian Approach to Address Cold Start and Non-Stationarity in Search Systems at Scalecited by 2
  12. 2021Calibrating Explore-Exploit Trade-off for Fair Online Learning to Rankcited by 1
12 more
  1. 2022Learning Neural Ranking Models Online from Implicit User Feedbackcited by 1
  2. 2022Low-variance estimation in the Plackett-Luce model via quasi-Monte Carlo samplingcited by 1
  3. 2023Recent Advances in the Foundations and Applications of Unbiased Learning to Rankcited by 1
  4. 2023Optimizing Group-Fair Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Ex-Post Fairnesscited by 1
  5. 2023RAIFLE: Reconstruction Attacks on Interaction-based Federated Learning with Adversarial Data Manipulationcited by 1
  6. 2024Investigating the Robustness of Counterfactual Learning to Rank Models: A Reproducibility Studycited by 1
  7. 2025A Large-Scale Web Search Dataset for Federated Online Learning to Rankcited by 0
  8. 2026Localization Boosting for Growth Markets: Mitigating Cross-Locale Behavioral Bias in Learning-to-Rankcited by 0
  9. 2026Exposure-Based Reinforcement Learning to Rankcited by 0
  10. 2026SalesLoop: Reinforcement Learning from Performance Feedback for Sales Lead Rankingcited by 0
  11. 2026Learning from What You Retrieve: Online RL Fine-Tuning for Semantic Retrievalcited by 0
  12. 2026Embedding Surgery: Localized Updates for Adaptive Ranking Correction in Dense Retrievalcited by 0