mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Multi-View Classification under Noisy Supervision via Global Anchor Consensus

arXiv 2607.18561 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, multi-view learning has attracted increasing attention, as it integrates the complementary information of heterogeneous views. Most existing multi-view classification methods rely on accurate annotations to guarantee performance. However, noisy labels are ubiquitous in practice due to imperfect annotation, and the refinement signals that existing methods derive from models trained on such noisy supervision can gradually lose their reliability. To deal with this problem, we propose a novel Global Anchor-based Label Auditing method (GALA) for multi-view classification to resist the negative impact of noisy labels. Specifically, we construct a global anchor for each class in every view, which aggregates the samples of the whole class and thus offers a stable reference insensitive to individual predictions. Then, each view measures how close an instance is to the anchor of its observed label relative to the nearest competing anchor, and the per-view evaluations are fused with the classifier confidence into a cross-view audit score. Based on the audit scores, suspicious samples are assigned small weights, and an adaptive correction strategy rewrites a label only when the anchor-based candidate agrees with the classifier prediction. Finally, the corrected labels in turn refine the anchors and supervise noise-robust representation learning. Extensive experiments on six datasets demonstrate that GALA outperforms eight state-of-the-art methods, especially under high noise rates.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2026.

Builds on

24 of 40 references.

References · 24

  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  2. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  3. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  5. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  6. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  7. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  8. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  9. 2022Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusioncited by 167
  10. 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
  11. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  12. 2016A Survey of Multi-View Representation Learningcited by 107
12 more
  1. 2021Trusted Multi-View Classificationcited by 94
  2. 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
  3. 2020Deep Partial Multi-View Learningcited by 71
  4. 2020MoPro: Webly Supervised Learning with Momentum Prototypescited by 66
  5. 2024Reliable Conflictive Multi-View Learningcited by 45
  6. 2023Deep Incomplete Multi-view Clustering with Cross-view Partial Sample and Prototype Alignmentcited by 33
  7. 2023GCFAgg: Global and Cross-view Feature Aggregation for Multi-view Clusteringcited by 30
  8. 2020Deep Multi-View Enhancement Hashing for Image Retrievalcited by 27
  9. 2023Exploring and Exploiting Uncertainty for Incomplete Multi-View Classificationcited by 13
  10. 2024NLPrompt: Noise-Label Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 9
  11. 2024Trusted Multi-view Learning under Noisy Supervisioncited by 8
  12. 2023Instance-dependent Noisy-label Learning with Graphical Model Based Noise-rate Estimationcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.